News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Joint Statement on the GNU Project by 68plus57equals5 on Monday October 07, 2019 @05:08PM (#21185953)
> He's been banned from multiple free software conferences that I've visited for his behavior; the first one of such was 7 years ago.

Could you name at least couple of those conferences he was banned from? Preferably with surrounding circumstances?

Re:Joint Statement on the GNU Project by jlokier on Tuesday October 08, 2019 @12:24AM (#21188752)
I can't answer that question.

But this HN comment does a good job of describing events at a recentish conference, although not a banning:

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21186822
Although I'm a big fan of RMS's deeper works (as will be obvious from my other comment), it's easy to imagine him (or to be honest, anyone insufficiently skilled at public speaking) making terribly misguided (at best) "jokes" and the like about how few women there are in tech and implying something about finding sex and girlfriends etc., and these being understood in some literal way as actual requests for sex (probably incorrectly). Just like the poor-taste sexist humour in the lower-scoring comments on Slashdot, only carried into the public, verbal arena, where it's a really bad idea, and indeed, alienating and oppressive.

That sort of thing could get a person banned at a conference these days. (It would have been treated as humorous banter a few decades ago, and I find myself imagining that's when RMS learned his trade.) But usually there's some kind of escalation process, where people are told to stop doing it, and, if necessary, have it explained to them what is unacceptable and why.

Re:Joint Statement on the GNU Project by javagram on Tuesday October 08, 2019 @08:58AM (#21191730)
Interesting to see the latest replies to the linked comment debunk it using video. People’s memories are slippery indeed!
Re:Joint Statement on the GNU Project by teddyh on Tuesday October 08, 2019 @02:34PM (#21195476)
People don’t have memories, as such. People have opinions about what their memories ought to be. Then they construct false memories as needed.

Note: I am describing everyone, not just “other people”.

Re:Joint Statement on the GNU Project by throwanem on Thursday October 10, 2019 @04:31PM (#21218850)
"Debunk" is a pretty strong word. If you haven't, you might want to look over the more recent replies.
Re:Joint Statement on the GNU Project by javagram on Thursday October 10, 2019 @08:38PM (#21220561)
Looking at it, I don’t see anything to change what I said. The person replied and doesn’t deny that they didn’t accurately state the words RMS said, just argues that what he actually said in the video is still bad since it’s a joke about sex, even though the words are opposite of what they claimed.

BTW, agreed sex jokes or talks should not have place in a technical conversation or conference. But I find misrepresenting comments to be questionable, and people criticizing others should at least spend the time to watch the video and transcribe the words correctly rather than misstate things.