Re:Starship Update
by acidburnNSA on Saturday September 28, 2019 @10:51PM
(#21104714)
Not using chemical rockets. Nuclear propulsion would be able to do it with the ~1000000x energy density advantage of nuclear fuel over chemical fuel.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Starship Update
by Baeocystin on Sunday September 29, 2019 @12:54AM
(#21105166)
I remember seeing a simple demonstrator some years back of a laser pulsing against the backside of a spinning disc, the geometry of things causing the heat from the laser to provide thrust.
I can't find the video I saw, but here's a general link on the topic:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_propulsion#Laser_energiz...
This comes with many problems, but it does bypass the rocket equation, while not requiring Project Orion levels of trouble.
I mean you still need to carry propellant: the stuff that is ablated away. It's just that the exhaust velocity is much higher.
Air from the atmosphere may be the propellant [1]. If sufficient velocity can be achieved before leaving the atmosphere, then no propellant is needed to be carried up on the way to orbit.
The problem is that the super-dense energy of a nuclear blast also evaporates solids and rains gamma rays on everything around.
Imagine how hard space exploration would be if the only practical rocket were a Project Orion.