Re:Plane Tests Must Use Average Pilots, NTSB Says After 737 ...
by VBprogrammer on Friday September 27, 2019 @11:02AM
(#21092741)
I think the point that I was trying to make is that a test pilot probably has attributes / skills which make them well qualified as test pilots but perhaps wouldn't make them particularly good line pilots and vice versa.
An ideal test pilots should excel in stick and rudder skills and have the ability to work around mechanical / system problems.
For a line pilot attributes like organisational skills and planning, interpersonal skills and meteorology skills are much more valuable.
Re:Plane Tests Must Use Average Pilots, NTSB Says After 737 ...
by dredmorbius on Friday September 27, 2019 @11:08PM
(#21098164)
Good points, though I'd argue that for a certification flight, you still want to both emphasize conventional operational training and activities and a minimum set of qualifications for those.
The principle for pilots is similar.
As to skills assessments, you're right, it's difficult. But you can use some general proxies. Certification pilots should be drawn from a standard pool, not a test-pilot pool. Some sense of performance on some standardised battery of qualification flights or simulator check-flights might be used, with scoring based on success or performance in identifying and addressing conditions encountered.
The fact that a precise quantity cannot be confidently stated doesn't mean that no quantity or range can be given.
And for the sake of the certification pilots, I'm assuming check-out flights would either be in simulators or with a more qualified check pilot assisting.