News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Serverless: slower and more expensive. Parent comment

Re:Serverless: slower and more expensive by ramraj07 on Monday September 23, 2019 @07:54AM (#21047981)
How did you replace a site that needed rds with s3? Was it a blog that you moved to Jekyll or something?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Serverless: slower and more expensive by cdumler on Monday September 23, 2019 @09:35AM (#21048767)
If you are comfortable with React, look at GatsbyJS. It is pretty amazing what you can build into a static site.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Serverless: slower and more expensive by edaemon on Monday September 23, 2019 @12:06PM (#21050183)
They may have used S3 Select: https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/s3-glacier-select/
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Serverless: slower and more expensive by Tenoke on Monday September 23, 2019 @11:04AM (#21049558)
S3 is just slower but in theory you can do everything you can with rds.

So e.g. if the queries you are making aren't time sensitive or are easily cached switching to s3 can be okay.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Serverless: slower and more expensive by stevehawk on Monday September 23, 2019 @09:36AM (#21048773)
most likely either Jekyll or Gatsby
[ Parent | on HN ]