Optics and Regex: Greater than the sum of their parts

Re:Optics and Regex: Greater than the sum of their parts by glangdale on Friday September 20, 2019 @09:51PM (#21032979)

I hate to be That Guy, but I found the massive overuse of exclamation points to be very distracting. I'm not quite at the level of those people who claim that using exclamation points is like laughing at your own jokes, but they should not be a default punctuation choice.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Optics and Regex: Greater than the sum of their parts by codesections on Saturday September 21, 2019 @12:05AM (#21033438)

> I hate to be That Guy, but I found the massive overuse of exclamation points to be very distracting.… [Exclamation points] should not be a default punctuation choice.

I think that's overstating it quite a bit. There's one exclamation point in the first four paragraphs. The frequency picks up a bit after that, but I'd hardly call them the default punctuation choice.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Optics and Regex: Greater than the sum of their parts by pierrec on Saturday September 21, 2019 @12:13AM (#21033466)

> The frequency picks up a bit after that

"Hopefully you learned something! Did you know I'm currently writing a book? It's all about Lenses and Optics! It takes you all the way from beginner to optics-wizard and it's currently in early access! Consider supporting it, and more posts like this one by pledging on my Patreon page!"

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Optics and Regex: Greater than the sum of their parts by sl1ck731 on Saturday September 21, 2019 @12:19AM (#21033494)

There are 62 exclamations and 54 periods (counted after removing the periods in code sections).

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Optics and Regex: Greater than the sum of their parts by benjaminbrodie2 on Saturday September 21, 2019 @12:50AM (#21033569)

http://www.qwantz.com/about.php

[ Parent | on HN ]