News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:NSA Said to Have Used Heartbleed Bug for at Least Two Yea... by tptacek on Friday September 20, 2019 @06:24PM (#21031934)
I'm not sure anyone really takes the IAD mission seriously. The actual purpose of the organization is to do offensive SIGINT.
Re:NSA Said to Have Used Heartbleed Bug for at Least Two Yea... by ENOTTY on Friday September 20, 2019 @07:44PM (#21032425)
They don't try to take information assurance seriously?

Are projects like SELinux[1], SE for Android[2], or the STM/PE[3] serious enough?

[1]: "Retrospective: 26 Years of Flexible MAC" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AKWFbxbsU3o

[2]: https://selinuxproject.org/page/SEforAndroid

[3]: https://www.cyberscoop.com/nsa-firmware-open-source-coreboot...

Re:NSA Said to Have Used Heartbleed Bug for at Least Two Yea... by tptacek on Friday September 20, 2019 @07:47PM (#21032444)
Oh, they requisition budget for the IAD mission, and they use it on IAD things. In reality, the most important thing NSA does is get budget allocated to itself! But does anyone believe that in a conflict between IAD and CNO/SIGINT, IAD has ever won?
Re:NSA Said to Have Used Heartbleed Bug for at Least Two Yea... by PeCaN on Friday September 20, 2019 @06:31PM (#21031979)
I think they got some retroactive goodwill from the DES thing when it was discovered that they legitimately made it stronger.

Of course, they've more than squandered that by now, but it's not like they always completely ignored the IAD.

Re:NSA Said to Have Used Heartbleed Bug for at Least Two Yea... by monocasa on Friday September 20, 2019 @06:28PM (#21031962)
I mean, I don't really have any sympathy for them writing off half their mission, despite the impunity with which they do so.
Re:NSA Said to Have Used Heartbleed Bug for at Least Two Yea... by JohnFen on Friday September 20, 2019 @06:32PM (#21031992)
Right, which is why any denial they make about this sort of thing is meaningless.