News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Too Many Video Streaming Choices May Drive Users Back To ... by dfxm12 on Wednesday September 18, 2019 @01:08PM (#21007467)
It's disingenuous to call switching libraries "inconvenient". We're talking about opening a new tab or switching an app. A few finger budges for ~2hr of entertainment. I don't know what to say if you find that so inconvenient, especially compared to the effort it would take to go to a torrent site, find a high quality stream, make sure it has the right special features you're looking for, or what have you, to pirate a movie.

If you're looking for an ever growing library of specific movies you want to watch, with the special features you want to consume, it sounds like you just want to buy movies. Netflix and co. were never that and were never advertised as that.

Re:Too Many Video Streaming Choices May Drive Users Back To ... by elif on Wednesday September 18, 2019 @01:12PM (#21007514)
The inconvenient part is I have to labor for income to pay for all these services. That's really a bummer because I prefer to not labor.

Additionally, I am in 6 countries for 9 months of this year. It is inconvenient that YouTube TV tells me the $35 I am paying them buys me absolutely nothing, despite the app saying "some content and local channels" will not be available, Netflix forces me to stop halfway through a series because I crossed a border. That's not convenient.

Piracy just works.

Re:Too Many Video Streaming Choices May Drive Users Back To ... by on_and_off on Wednesday September 18, 2019 @03:58PM (#21009399)
Ouch moving countries is something I did not touch because of what a nightmare it is for many of these services and because it is not the "common" case.

It took me one year to transfer my google account to another country.

I am not doing it again.

Re:Too Many Video Streaming Choices May Drive Users Back To ... by holy_city on Wednesday September 18, 2019 @01:43PM (#21007899)
It's my understanding that the issues with international content distribution have to do with regulatory differences across borders, not the streaming services themselves.
Re:Too Many Video Streaming Choices May Drive Users Back To ... by arghwhat on Wednesday September 18, 2019 @01:55PM (#21008040)
It has to do mainly with an archaic business model where the rights are given to local distributors that have no purpose anymore.

They are the only ones allowed to license the work in a region, so providibg a movie or selection requires separate licensing agreements for every country or region it is served in.

Businesses that manage to take fees for nothing due historic reasons need to be eliminated.

Re:Too Many Video Streaming Choices May Drive Users Back To ... by mjevans on Wednesday September 18, 2019 @02:02PM (#21008151)
Segmented distribution, be it to exclusivity silos or regional isolation, doesn't work.

My gut prediction is that if a service has a strong correlation to the desired content, E.G. Disney+ for "kids", it MIGHT work out, at least in the short term. HOWEVER, for wider culture, and particularly with different "tv networks" and studios with content libraries split among many services, the friction of not having a single place with everything, of not having a 'streaming store', will drive many to routing around the insanity and accessing the culture they want on terms they're willing to agree to.

Short version:

    * have everything, I mean it.
    * cost less than basic cable (total)
    * completely ad free (probably)
    * offline caching is a must (road trips)
    * capable of playing on anything I want (DRM free)
Re:Too Many Video Streaming Choices May Drive Users Back To ... by dvdbloc on Wednesday September 18, 2019 @01:58PM (#21008079)
Does little to change the point, piracy still doesn’t have these restrictions.
Re:Too Many Video Streaming Choices May Drive Users Back To ... by elif on Wednesday September 18, 2019 @02:20PM (#21008335)
Regulatory differences are a flaw unique to paid services, though. Piracy has no such flaw.
Re:Too Many Video Streaming Choices May Drive Users Back To ... by deogeo on Wednesday September 18, 2019 @04:11PM (#21009547)
> regulatory differences

Interesting way of saying "corporate exclusivity agreements", which is what this ends up being in 99 out of 100 cases.

Re:Too Many Video Streaming Choices May Drive Users Back To ... by katbyte on Wednesday September 18, 2019 @01:25PM (#21007693)
> A few finger budges for ~2hr of entertainment.

It's more like: check sites 1-5 looking for the movie, can't find it (or it a PPV download, OR the app/site doesn't support 5.1 DDS, its quality is bad) get frustrated go onto $torrentsite, sort by size, download one with most seeders & a larger file size wait 30-60 min and done.

Netflix used to make it easier as their app UX and quality are high so it was a one stop shop. Now i just find torrenting easier to make sure its high quality with 5.1.. however i may not be the norm.

Re:Too Many Video Streaming Choices May Drive Users Back To ... by thirdsun on Thursday September 19, 2019 @09:52AM (#21016138)
Another often overlooked technical detail: Streaming clients and supporting the proper framerate of the content. My projector supports 24p as do most other displays, but good luck making sure that Netflix' and other streaming service clients on various devices actually output 24p and not interpolated 60Hz leading to micro stutter.

I understand that many displays have decent interpolation features these days, which hide the issues, but they are still a solution to an unnecessary problem.

A bluray or a good rip of it delivers the film in proper fashion. It's a non-issue with pirated content.

Re:Too Many Video Streaming Choices May Drive Users Back To ... by homonculus1 on Wednesday September 18, 2019 @02:13PM (#21008264)
There is considerable mental overhead involved in trying to remember where your choice is hosted, cycling through redundant apps and menu pages, waiting through load times, repeatedly entering the same search terms without a proper keyboard, getting blasted with different promotions from each service, etc.

It's a stupid and frustrating experience and every time it happens is a reminder that my interests as a customer rank dead last after all of these companies slice and dice their cultural fiefdoms into separate packages to squeeze a little extra revenue. Calling it a few finger budges is reductive, it's an insulting and tiresome rigmarole of hoops that I have to jump through just because they wanted to squeeze some more money.

Re:Too Many Video Streaming Choices May Drive Users Back To ... by bluedino on Wednesday September 18, 2019 @01:35PM (#21007796)
It's a pain to switch on my smart TV. It's also a pain to search every service for a movie.