Re:California passes bill that classifies gig economy worker...
by pishpash on Wednesday September 11, 2019 @08:51AM
(#20939493)
Software "engineer" is not a (licensed) engineer, for the hundredth time.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:California passes bill that classifies gig economy worker...
by PorterDuff on Wednesday September 11, 2019 @10:46AM
(#20940734)
It's a shame that doesn't exist. I've always thought you could make an especially strong argument for licensing for embedded software people, for many of the same reasons that a PE is licensed.
It wouldn't be a requirement for a job necessarily, but not a bad thing to have.
Re:California passes bill that classifies gig economy worker...
by chroma on Wednesday September 11, 2019 @12:27PM
(#20941920)
I doubt such a certification would have any correlation with ability. Maybe the platonic ideal of training and testing that you're thinking of, but not a certification written by the US government. Even competent parts of the government like NIST take forever to update their standards. It would be worse for a licensing bureau with practically no in-house software expertise.
Re:California passes bill that classifies gig economy worker...
by 0xffff2 on Wednesday September 11, 2019 @01:55PM
(#20942868)
You can get a computer engineering PE, which would probably be appropriate for the vast majority of embedded software developers. There was a software PE for a few years, but my understanding is that it was dropped for lack of interest.