pishpash

It would be baking the model into hardware or FPGA, which ends up building the same thing being emulated. An emulated ALU in hardware is ... the ALU.

How can self custody be a novelty when it is the original way and predates exchanges...

Isn't the whole point of this to decide what "shady" CA's to trust? If a Russian site bothered to get signed in Greece, some people will trust the site, and some people will distrust the Greek CA's. That's how trust works.

You can add other options too, "Trust for 30 days" or something. I wish SSH known hosts has an auto-expunge.

"It seems like you're visiting a site registered in XYZ country. Do you want to start trusting XYZ country key authorities?

[Do Not Trust], [Trust Once], [Trust Forever]"

Yet they ask you what keyboard type to use, what Wifi network and password to use. Is it too much to ask, do you want to trust "key authorities" from outside your country? Users used to see computers as inherently technical devices and expect to get asked technical questions.

But even if not, you get asked whether to turn on Siri, whether to send telemetry, whether to sign away your rights, etc., all of which are consequential but prompts are massaged in a way where it's nice and easy for the user to answer a certain way without having a clue. Makes me think user comprehension isn't even a problem.

Where I suspect the problem lies is that it will not fly to make it seem like US-based CA's are more trustworthy just because the majority of sites roll up to them. Then you'll need to do some non-country-specific human tiering, and who's the judge of that?

Why would that be? You're stuck on drivers either way and ARM Windows runs just fine virtualized.

Yeah, this gives a new meaning to demanding your password at the border.

What a sleight of hand. PDF's are obviously not executable, any more than text files are. Decoders are executable and they can choose to unsafely handle input. Even plain text editors can have exploits. It's no different than any piece of complex software.

Where's the stance that "we tested them all", any links?

One may even speculate the author got some, or a lot of ... "help", if it's even a real author.

Why would it 'randomly' place things anyway. If there is ever a space constraint the most space-saving way is to group into highly generalizable concepts.

It only started with Google.

Human drama is what people use to advocate for themselves. Bureaucracy is what people use to protect themselves. Then you have the side effects but, you may also not like a world without those at all.

Same as before, really. You can have geniuses but if not used right you get nothing.

The first time, sure, it saves compute. The second time you ask, I feel like it should be the time to go into thinking/verification mode. But who are you? Are you paying? Does the answer being correct generate ad dollars? No? Then your usage mode isn't even being optimized for in their A/B test, probably.

In fact, if hallucinating the wrong answer hooks you into doing even more searches or into buying something useless, it would be preferred!

I thought Google's original goal for a search engine was exactly this, answer any question whatsoever.

Isn't it more likely that (hubristically perhaps) they would believe it unnecessary to hire any experts other than model building experts?

In fact, the narrower the constraint the simpler it becomes to focus effort towards the remaining opening. To any problem solver which these agents are it is like being given a hint. Real defense often employs misdirection, message black holes, honeypots and other boobytraps, not a jail with one obvious door.

Why do you need another model-type specific Ollama? Can't Ollama be made to support these models?

This shit can get highly dangerous, much more so than some datacenter hacking. Where did the doomsday fear go now?

There is no point in that because the loss function itself is already an approximation. No one knows what is the exact loss function for any given non-trivial real-world task.

Animals are born walking. Humans are somewhat deficient and need more training postpartum.

What happens when the network flakes out? Cloud will never work for this.

Yet remote pilots can fight wars on the other side of the world?

It won't move as fast as gzip provided the same resources, but to say that LLM's can never run at 300mbps on any hardware is ... a bold bet.

It's a price discriminator, to dissuade the pet owning group from renting. Why? Because they also cause negative externality to other units. That's what I can think of. If they could do a child charge I'm sure they would.

That already exists in many states. The problem is you need to take the landlord to court to recover, if they don't pony up.

Because of innumeracy. You can hide a business opportunity in basic arithmetics. If it's "too hard" to calculate people give up.

This isn't a ban on junk fees. It's an upfront disclosure requirement.

Causation or correlation (if that)? I doubt small time landlords are charging these fees anyway.