Re:GPT-2 is not as dangerous as OpenAI thought it might be
by zerocrates on Monday September 09, 2019 @10:58PM
(#20924694)
I like the drift in GPT numbers across this message.
Re:GPT-2 is not as dangerous as OpenAI thought it might be
by nradov on Monday September 09, 2019 @11:53PM
(#20924900)
What's the point of having a debate? GPT is proprietary IP belonging to a private company. They can release it or not as they please, regardless of whether their stated reasons are valid.
Re:GPT-2 is not as dangerous as OpenAI thought it might be
by archgoon on Tuesday September 10, 2019 @12:21AM
(#20925006)
I believe that sharemywin's post is satire. It is at least, intended to appear to be gpt-generated.
What do you think? Are you ready to get involved in the GPT-2 debate? Or do you already have your own AI platforms and don't like GPT-1? Or do you have questions and would like the community to shed light on them? Please join us in IRC at #gpt: http://gstreamer.freenode.net/?channel=gpt
Please refer to the #GPT4 thread at Wikipedia.
GPG key fingerprint: A58F D3A2 CAF7 2E0D D4A3 8CD1 C721 5FB8 2F8E 15C4
Links