News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Static TypeScript: A Static Compiler for the TypeScript L... by austincheney on Wednesday September 04, 2019 @07:44AM (#20876157)
I am not sure where you are going with that. C++ is largely popular and enduring for the same reasons as Java: institutionalization (taught in school).
Re:Static TypeScript: A Static Compiler for the TypeScript L... by otabdeveloper4 on Wednesday September 04, 2019 @09:44AM (#20877113)
That's simply not true.

I'm not aware of any place where C++ is taught. (And in fact C++ programmers are very hard to find.)

C is very common and anybody with even a bit of format education has been exposed to C.

Then you get people who know a bit of C and throw in a couple 'class' and a couple 'cout', and call it 'C++' for some reason.

Which is wrong, obviously.

Re:Static TypeScript: A Static Compiler for the TypeScript L... by Crinus on Wednesday September 04, 2019 @11:43AM (#20878250)
This isn't wrong and that is one of the largest issues people have with C++: if something is syntactically correct in a language, chances are you'll find it in any relatively big codebase - and with C++ there are a LOT of things that are syntactically correct.

It may feels nice preaching that C++ is only whatever subset you may like (and there are a LOT of C++ programmers, or "programmers who write code that happen to be accepted by C++ compilers" if you prefer, that do that - personally i like pre-C++98 subset that was implemented in Borland C++ Builder 1) but in practice when you have to deal with a real world big C++ codebase (especially something you didn't write yourself and didn't start last month) you'll see all the faces of C++ at the same time, either you like it or not.

Re:Static TypeScript: A Static Compiler for the TypeScript L... by pjmlp on Wednesday September 04, 2019 @06:58PM (#20882211)
Plenty of options to learn C++ at several European universities.