Also, of course I have opinions just like you. I told my story. And some people liked it and upvoted. I don't get why that deserves a "wtf" other than trying to rally people to downvote me.
To quote myself, re "write-only language":
>>If you wonder what is wrong with that quote, check the Best Practices book.
Was that really so hard? (I might add that PBP isn't directly new... Then we have Moose, which is the best OO system among the scripting languages, etc...)
Edit: I might comment on this part, that "po" added afterwards:
>>Also, of course I have opinions just like you.
Well, I don't go and write standard troll comments from ten years ago in language discussions...
Edit: If I should touch your point, too... the OP's complaints are literally about 1990s system administrators, which weren't really programmers. You'll get bad code in any language without coding standards, etc.
>>It is what I would call a write-only language.
I get a bit of vertigo, here...
You really left about a decade ago -- and don't seem to know much about what has happened since. But you have opinions?!
(If you wonder what is wrong with that quote, check the Best Practices book. [Edit: And as someone noted, chromatic's "Modern Perl" is good.] And so on.)
But the real joke here, are the upvotes. wtf?
Edit: For the third time... :-) "Write only language" is just trolling. PBP by Conway is the standard work on layout, variable naming etc etc. It is from 2005...