Re:Deconstructing Google’s excuses on tracking protection
by zaarn on Saturday August 24, 2019 @03:47AM
(#20785877)
You don't pay 0.4 cents to watch a video though, some advertiser pays that to get you to watch the ad. The true value of the video is likely much lower.
Re:Deconstructing Google’s excuses on tracking protection
by pdkl95 on Saturday August 24, 2019 @05:13AM
(#20786127)
> You don't pay 0.4 cents to watch a video though
Sometimes we pay a lot more: https://graphtreon.com/patreon-stats
> The true value of the video is likely much lower.
The true value of the video varies a lot. Some are demonstrably very highly valued: https://graphtreon.com/top-patreon-creators
Re:Deconstructing Google’s excuses on tracking protection
by zaarn on Saturday August 24, 2019 @05:34AM
(#20786194)
I don't think patreon is a good metric since there a low number of people pay for content early or exlusives, meaning the cost is distributed among less people. A video on youtube will cost less and has less value since it's available to more people.
Re:Deconstructing Google’s excuses on tracking protection
by opportune on Friday August 23, 2019 @06:29PM
(#20783344)
If I could load, say, $10 into some Google account and in return that buys me complete exemption from tracking + ads on 10k site visits, I would absolutely do that in a heart beat. I wonder if they have thought about doing that yet
Re:Deconstructing Google’s excuses on tracking protection
by naniwaduni on Friday August 23, 2019 @07:13PM
(#20783696)
That's almost what Contributor is, but how could that possibly exempt you from tracking? They'd have to identify you to exempt you from it...
Re:Deconstructing Google’s excuses on tracking protection
by KptMarchewa on Saturday August 24, 2019 @06:52AM
(#20786447)
On a browser level? Some kind of google extension. Or just build in Chrome.
Re:Deconstructing Google’s excuses on tracking protection
by notyourwork on Friday August 23, 2019 @07:35PM
(#20783878)
I’m guessing that is not even close to revenue generated. I was told by a pandora engineer a few years ago if all users paid for premium to drop ads they couldn’t stay afloat. It seems the ad industry is milking businesses and users have no choice in the matter.
Re:Deconstructing Google’s excuses on tracking protection
by rgbrenner on Friday August 23, 2019 @09:41PM
(#20784597)
Just because he worked there, doesn't mean he understands the economics of the business.
A premium account is $10/mo.. or $30/quarter. Pandora is part of sirius now.. but spotify has revenue of about 5.50/user/quarter.
Either Pandora is 6x more effective at monetization than Spotify (very unlikely), or that engineer was wrong.
Re:Deconstructing Google’s excuses on tracking protection
by JohnJamesRambo on Saturday August 24, 2019 @01:26AM
(#20785415)
If this is true why did they constantly inundate you with ads to upgrade to premium? They should have been trying to actively hide the fact they have premium.
Re:Deconstructing Google’s excuses on tracking protection
by CydeWeys on Saturday August 24, 2019 @10:42AM
(#20787372)
https://fundingchoices.google.com/start/ ?
It's sort of related.
Now, you have to imagine the CPM is directly related to the value of the goods being sold. That scales per country. It's probably not the perfect proxy, but in the same sense that your viewers from other countries pay out different CPMs, they can probably afford different amounts per video.
It isn't about anonymity. It's about abuse of data. I'm not mad that I can't make anonymous phone calls, I'm mad that my phone provider sells my real time location data. I am happy to pay a company that preserves privacy and trust them with my information. This is a bit aside though, because I more or less trust Google with my information, I just don't like ads. It's not about anonymity.