News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Scientists Have Been Underestimating the Pace of Climate ... by agent008t on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @07:51AM (#20745816)
Why? Are there reasons to believe that the shareholders/board members of these companies would not be negatively affected by climate change? Or are they ignorant?
Re:Scientists Have Been Underestimating the Pace of Climate ... by nestedcaveats on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @08:27AM (#20746118)
It's a tragedy of the commons situation. Any individual company could bankrupt itself with climate action and not make a dent in emissions. Worse, any progress they did make would be an excuse for other actors to lessen their own efforts. Little serious progress will be made until nation states start putting the screws to corporations and each other.
Re:Scientists Have Been Underestimating the Pace of Climate ... by Dumblydorr on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @09:07AM (#20746506)
Except that climate change response is the best wealth generation mechanism for the 21st century. No company will bankrupt themselves by being more efficient, using more renewable, buying some batteries, EVs. These are already good investments. The problem is corporate greed driving down investment and morality in exchange for buybacks and CEO compensation.
Re:Scientists Have Been Underestimating the Pace of Climate ... by mbrumlow on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @11:09AM (#20747810)
> No company will bankrupt themselves by being more efficient, using more renewable, buying some batteries, EVs.

All those things cost money... More money than they are spending today. Even if they just replaced things as they retired, say a work vehicle -- there is still a non zero cost of owning two different types of vehicle.

> These are already good investments.

All the things you listed would normally be listed as a liability and deprecate fairly fast.

> exchange for buybacks and CEO compensation

This is such a small dent in the entire system that it would not make any difference if they spent all the excess cash on the problem. There was a article once about some big CEO of a airline getting some bonus of 12 million. Everybody was freaking out, and demanded it be given to the workers. I did the math on that one, it would have been about 19 cents a hour more for every worker (who were already making $12 + a hour, a 1.6% pay increase or less in most cases)

I am on your side, but just wanting it to happen and calling those who say the money math don't work as greedy is not going to solve the problem. I think people vastly under estimate how much it cost to run some of these large companies, and how thin the profit margin actually is. Paying even slightly more than your competitor can make our break you.

Re:Scientists Have Been Underestimating the Pace of Climate ... by hcurtiss on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @08:00AM (#20745889)
There is abundant incentive to not act unilaterally in a manner that hurts the bottom line in a competitive environment (i.e., most business environments). There is very little incentive in that environment to act collectively.
Re:Scientists Have Been Underestimating the Pace of Climate ... by DennisP on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @08:09AM (#20745951)
That's why voluntary unilateral actions won't be sufficient, but it doesn't explain why we're not taking collective action, like enacting a price on carbon.
Re:Scientists Have Been Underestimating the Pace of Climate ... by RubenSandwich on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @08:18AM (#20746019)
That has quite a bit due to the fact that lobbying works and has an amazing ROI. It only cost about $1 million to divide voters enough to fail to pass a carbon tax in Washington State: https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/rival-par.... (I understand it wasn’t just lobbying, but I think it played a major role.)

I hate to be cynical but the ROI of lobbying against climate change is super cheap. How can we switch this equation?

Re:Scientists Have Been Underestimating the Pace of Climate ... by Dumblydorr on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @09:09AM (#20746525)
Get money out of politics, that is the one lens through which all issues are focused these days. The greater Good is out of focus while corporations focus the lens exactly where they want
Re:Scientists Have Been Underestimating the Pace of Climate ... by tonyedgecombe on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @07:59AM (#20745881)
Presumably they think they are rich enough to buy themselves out of any problems.
Re:Scientists Have Been Underestimating the Pace of Climate ... by franky47 on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @08:18AM (#20746021)
The sad reality is that they probably are able to buy their way of of this.

I was visiting Tito's bunker in Bosnia last week, and to think it was ok to build a multi-billion dollar facility to hold only 350 politicians and VIPs in case of global nuclear wipeout seems crazy, but when the need arises, people with power will always try and find a quick way out, often at the expense of others.

Re:Scientists Have Been Underestimating the Pace of Climate ... by kiliantics on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @10:35AM (#20747445)
There is already a thriving economy of building climate change bunkers for billionaires.
Re:Scientists Have Been Underestimating the Pace of Climate ... by DennisP on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @11:49AM (#20748302)
The fact that they don't already live in their bunker suggests it would be a downgrade to their lifestyle. So why wouldn't they want to avoid it?
Re:Scientists Have Been Underestimating the Pace of Climate ... by selimthegrim on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @10:25AM (#20747327)
Was this the aerodrome in the mountain near the Croatian border?
Re:Scientists Have Been Underestimating the Pace of Climate ... by franky47 on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @11:43AM (#20748226)
No it's located in a mountain near Konjic, between Mostar and Sarajevo. It now serves as a modern art gallery and a museum to the cold war. The place is very well preserved, as the bunker's HVAC unit has been running since the 60's.
Re:Scientists Have Been Underestimating the Pace of Climate ... by ryanmercer on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @08:35AM (#20746188)
The vast majority of people, at best, think climate channge is something that'll be a problem for their grandchildren or great grandchildren. Many still believe it is a made up thing the news/politicians created.

Many people don't care about long-term stuff either. Look at how many people have no qualms throwing trash out their car window. Look at how many people have no qualms about taking vacations flying all over the place racking up tons of CO2 personally.

Even YC created http://carbon.ycombinator.com as they acknowledge it's an issue (to some extent anyway) yet they still fly hundreds of people out to the Bay Area for in-person interviews each year to select founders for funding, which could instead be done via video chat and used kilograms of CO2 at worst instead of many tons (on average, a plane produces a little over 53 pounds of CO2 per mile. This can be somewhat higher or lower depending upon the type of aviation fuel).

And then take people that truly realize how much of a problem is like I do.

- I have to go to work, it is not practical for me to walk to work so I have to drive a car to work.

- It is not practical for me to not use electricity, living in an apartment I have to use it to cook, to dry my clothes even if I chose to wash them by hand, to run the air conditioning a good chunk of the year to keep the humidity down to prevent mold, to run the heat in the winter because it gets down to -12F/-24C a few days of the year

- I can't walk around naked and both natural fibers and synthetic fibers rely heavily on oil to manufacture

- I can't go buy food from my neighbor or grow my own in a garden, so my food is trucked across the country or even shipped from halfway around the world

So people like me go "nothing I do on a personal level is going to make a damn bit of difference, why bother" and you sit there watching Netflix knowing that every gigabyte you stream is probably another 100-300 grams of CO2 into the atmosphere.

And you sit there depressed - knowing you are breathing in microplastics, knowing you are eating and drinking microplastics, knowing those microplastics and other air pollutants are likely increasing your risk of cancer considerably, knowing that 30 something cities with populations over 1 million people have run out of clean water (or water entirely) including India's 6th largest city by population, knowing that it's probably unwise to have children because sooner or later in their life the world is going to become a largely shitty and miserable place when food/water wars start, knowing that global insect biomass has considerably reduced in your short 34 years on earth, knowing because you are barely in the lower middle class you're probably going to be one of the ones to starve at some point because you'll lose your job and have a hard time finding another and a crop failure or three will cause food prices to go up 200%, 300%, 1000% or more in your lifetime and you'll get to experience what life is like for people in North Korea when you're eating whatever you can get your hands on.

The shareholders, the C-level employees, don't care because they aren't feeling the impacts already. They have fancy houses, fancy cars, take fancy vacations, they wear nice clothes and have more money than they need. The bulk of them have never filed bankruptcy or worried regularly how they're going to put food on the table, the majority of them have never known real struggle. They aren't concerned about climate change because they think the money will always be flowing in and they'll always have stuff.

Look at the articles over the past few years about the rich buying land in New Zealand like Peter Thiel did.

Re:Scientists Have Been Underestimating the Pace of Climate ... by malvosenior on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @09:15AM (#20746596)
If it makes you feel better, by almost every metric the vast majority of humanity is living the best they have in all of human history. If you live in the west it’s even better because we haven’t had any local wars in nearly 80 years. I think a lot of people need to study history a bit more to understand how great things are now for most of the global population.
Re:Scientists Have Been Underestimating the Pace of Climate ... by toofy on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @10:06AM (#20747183)
I definitely agree with you that things are better than they’ve ever been.

However, much of that security, it hinges on a delusion that this security will go away if we address climate change, which is of course mostly untrue. If we address this soon, it’s a matter of scaling back on a few luxuries while keeping other luxuries and the basics which keep us healthy and fed.

One example of many, how many suburban homes in the US touch much of their space more than once or twice a year? How many have multiple completely unused heated and air conditioned bedrooms? How much of suburban home’s storage is used by stuff which is bought and never gets touched again?

My house currently, about 2/3rds of the space is rarely touched, the storage in the garage and closets is full (organized, i’m not a hoarder lol) but full of projects and stuff which was bought because it seemed like a fun idea at the store, and all of that space is heated and cooled all year long.

The thought processes which go into the type of “need” for this much wasted space is just a norm readjustment which on a fundamental level mostly won’t impact our daily safety issues and still allow actual important luxuries.

If we wait, well, that’s when difficult decisions will have to be made, many of which will greatly impact fundamental life changes.

Re:Scientists Have Been Underestimating the Pace of Climate ... by adrianN on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @09:29AM (#20746752)
It's always best just before the party is over, right?
Re:Scientists Have Been Underestimating the Pace of Climate ... by malvosenior on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @09:45AM (#20746941)
No?
Re:Scientists Have Been Underestimating the Pace of Climate ... by imtringued on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @09:37AM (#20746845)
The problem is that it won't be great for much longer.
Re:Scientists Have Been Underestimating the Pace of Climate ... by malvosenior on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @09:45AM (#20746938)
There are no signs that technological progress is slowing (the driving factor behind our success).
Re:Scientists Have Been Underestimating the Pace of Climate ... by kiliantics on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @10:51AM (#20747615)
Great so let's just forget any of what the parent commenter just said...

This Steven Pinker/Bill Gates cheerleeding nonsense is such a distraction. We need more anger and frustration to be stoked against those in power, not some kind of pacifying bullshit about how amazing all our technological gadgets have made our lives. It won't be worth anything once all the above starts happening. And for some people, this apocalypse has already begun.

Re:Scientists Have Been Underestimating the Pace of Climate ... by AnIdiotOnTheNet on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @09:34AM (#20746808)
Actually, the Amish demonstrate that all those things are practical, just inconvenient. Having a community helps.
Re:Scientists Have Been Underestimating the Pace of Climate ... by ryanmercer on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @09:50AM (#20747008)
And I'm not Amish, I don't have an Amish or Mennonite community to support me with all these things.

Also the Amish and Mennonite communities still heavily rely on mass-produced goods manufactured in the same factories we all get stuff from.

- mass produced pre-packaged foods (they will absolutely buy and consume junk food, I know a former Amish - he literally wrote a book called Growing Up Amish) and we have a ton of them here in Indiana)

- hired cars/mass transportation

- community telephones

- manufactured farm equipment

- refrigeration for dairy operations (they have to by law)

Amish also have

- Alcoholism in their communities, mostly among youth

- A good deal of drug use in their communities, mostly among youth

Orange is the New Black didn't include an Amish girl just for the novelty of it, the included her because it's accurate. I imagine a good deal of this escapism via drugs and alcohol is a direct result of their lifestyle.

And yes, some tribal society in Randomplace also lives largely without modern conveniences but they have the knowledge, they have the experience, in most cases it is all they've never known.

My comment was talking about ME, Ryan Mercer, not Generic Human. I can't go claim a bunch of land and set up my own farm/commune/colony, I do not have the knowledge or manpower, I do not have the resources, it is not practical for me or most of the 'first world'.

Re:Scientists Have Been Underestimating the Pace of Climate ... by ptah on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @09:30AM (#20746758)
companies only plan 3 months ahead so it is not really on their horizon
Re:Scientists Have Been Underestimating the Pace of Climate ... by anticensor on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @10:19AM (#20747289)
They do plan well ahead but most investors consider each term to be an independent target.