Re:YAML: Probably not so great after all
by JoBrad on Sunday August 18, 2019 @10:17PM
(#20734381)
And the required double quotes around strings. YAML’s string handling is a lot easier to deal with.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:YAML: Probably not so great after all
by zzo38computer on Monday August 19, 2019 @11:33AM
(#20738648)
I think it is good to require quotation marks for strings, at least for values (although I could live with it if quotation marks for strings are allowed even if not required, since then, if you do not like the feature of not having quotation marks for strings, you can just not use that feature).
Maybe it would be sense if quotation marks were not required for keys with only a restricted character set which are not an empty string, though.
Re:YAML: Probably not so great after all
by JoBrad on Wednesday August 21, 2019 @10:34AM
(#20757590)
No quotes around keys would be sufficient, honestly. I use YAML a lot for API documentation, and there are still some cases where wrapping your values in quotes is necessary. But requiring it for keys becomes very annoying.
It’s also a lot less obvious. What’s so difficult about wrapping a string in double quotes?
It gets annoying when you have to do what seems unnecessary.
Re:YAML: Probably not so great after all
by Griffinsauce on Monday August 19, 2019 @02:39AM
(#20735435)
It's not really unnecessary when someone can write an entire article on how unfathomable the output is without them.
It’s easier until you hit one of the cases where a particular value is interpreted as a different type, possibly in a very confusing context. I’ve seen that bite enough people that I end up quoting strings to avoid confusion.
Re:YAML: Probably not so great after all
by heavenlyblue on Monday August 19, 2019 @09:32AM
(#20737561)
It’s also extremely hard to learn as a beginner.
“Hey, I deleted a character in a string and now I am getting this weird schema validation exception”.