News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:U.S. Farmers Stung by Tariffs Now Face a $3.5B Corn Loss by wpdev_63 on Friday August 16, 2019 @08:23PM (#20720971)
A 100 years ago it would take a 1000 people to plant, maintain, and pick a farm that would take a just one person and a machine to do today. Obviously we don't need as many farmers as we did back then and a result of that is the collapse of the food prices.

Do you really care that with all the spending the government does that farmer subsidies are a problem? I'd rather see more people farming than building bombs, evading my privacy for 'security', and wars fought over ideology.

Re:U.S. Farmers Stung by Tariffs Now Face a $3.5B Corn Loss by rabidrat on Friday August 16, 2019 @09:11PM (#20721248)
To be fair, that machine took N people to manufacture (along with upkeep, which I imagine that one farm person is no longer doing on the complicated farm machinery), and another M people to drill/refine/transport the fuel, fertilizer, pesticides, and other chemicals needed to run such a farm so efficiently. I wonder how big N+M+1 is..
Re:U.S. Farmers Stung by Tariffs Now Face a $3.5B Corn Loss by numakerg on Saturday August 17, 2019 @12:41AM (#20722090)
Probably fewer per calorie of food grown.
Re:U.S. Farmers Stung by Tariffs Now Face a $3.5B Corn Loss by Dylan16807 on Saturday August 17, 2019 @02:21AM (#20722489)
> I'd rather see more people farming than building bombs, evading my privacy for 'security', and wars fought over ideology.

Or instead of either kind of wasteful labor we could let people work fewer hours...

Re:U.S. Farmers Stung by Tariffs Now Face a $3.5B Corn Loss by jaredklewis on Saturday August 17, 2019 @03:15AM (#20722671)
Being less bad than a bomb is not a very high bar to jump over.

I can think of many more productive uses for that money than over-farming, which causes a host of environmental issues.