News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on You-Dont-Need-Lodash-Underscore.

Re:You-Dont-Need-Lodash-Underscore by dymk on Friday August 09, 2019 @01:46PM (#20656662)
Half the implementations that use "native" (likely polyfilled) APIs are basically the implementation that lodash uses! Not to mention you miss out on lodash's "chaining" API.

The suggestion is basically "don't use this well-tested, popular library, copy/paste all this other code (with no tests) into your source tree directly!" which is just ludicrous

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:You-Dont-Need-Lodash-Underscore by thatswrong0 on Friday August 09, 2019 @04:26PM (#20658000)
Yeah this is borderline insanity to me. I just don’t get the point. I feel like the use case for this is extremely limited.. most developers don’t have such onerous bundle size requirements that they can’t afford to include lodash.
[ Parent | on HN ]