News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:U.S. to set up plan aimed at allowing prescription drugs ... by arcticbull on Wednesday July 31, 2019 @05:28PM (#20578752)
If that's the case, why does a flight from SFO-JFK cost way less than a flight from JFK-LHR in business class? Approximately the same distance, approximately the same cost basis. Dramatically more competition between JFK and LHR. It's not always about competition or cost basis.
Re:U.S. to set up plan aimed at allowing prescription drugs ... by tathougies on Wednesday July 31, 2019 @08:12PM (#20580029)
Because I said profit is driven zero not revenue. JFK to lhr requires all sorts of international permitting that is a fixed and varying cost that domestic routes do not have.

Airlines are a great example of the race to zero profit. Airline margins are slim and thus the cost of travel often reflects exactly the cost of doing the flight itself. JFK to Heathrow requires participation in multiple markets, currency instability, multiple regulators etc which make the cost more excessive. Also london and new York airports are busier than sfo increasing airport fees. Thus in a market with low basically zero margins, the cost from ny to London is more as competitors that cant make the unit economics work leave the market entirely. New competitora cant enter the market at a lower price point because their profit would be zero.

Re:U.S. to set up plan aimed at allowing prescription drugs ... by FeeJai on Wednesday July 31, 2019 @06:48PM (#20579404)
Why do you think there is more competition to LHR than domestically? The airport has been maxed out for almost 30 years, it is incedibly hard to get landing slots there. Also the weather over the atlantic makes flights longer and use more fuel.