FeeJai
The big difference is: No one forced them to land at a specific location -- they could have turned around and fly all the way back to Russia had they desired to do so. They landed in Austria because they decided to go to a neutral country and that they wanted to avoid NATO. It is fairly obvious that not letting someone enter is very different from letting enter and then coerce.
Very scary and impressive videos of the crash on YouTube
Totally agree, it's all talk and no do. Does not change the fact that intending to do so (or at least pretending the intent) would not make you a progressive leftist in the us as the author suggested.
> In the 2008 financial crisis (and now again) the government paid part of workers’ wages to save jobs (Kurzarbeit)
Trump went even further and sent checks directly to every taxpayer.
> She stopped mandatory military service
US got rid of the draft in 1973 under Nixon
> Germany is getting out of nuclear power by 2022 > Germany is getting out of coal power by 2038
Neither is the business of the federal government in the US but instead of the states themselves, on top of that this is done in Germany by importing exactly that power from other European neighbours, an option the US does not have.
> She ran a balanced budget
That is considered as on the right in the US
> Legalized gay marriage
The US had that first nationwide, and individual states had it much earlier. On top of that, Merkel voted against that law in the German parliament (Bundestag)
> Accepted a large number of refugees from war-torn Syria
Since Syria is closer to Europe than to the US this is not surprising, the US accepts asylum from middle and south America instead.
> Cut taxes (Solidaritätszuschlag) for the working class and middle class, while keeping them in place for the upper class
Sounds like the tax reform of 2017
> If you did one of these things in the US, you would be considered a progressive leftist. Doing all of them would make you a radical. In Germany she is still considered center-right.
-> While this is a nice visualization, the author had no idea about US politics and how it contrasts to German politics
The problem with facebook's approach is that you can get stuck in local optima and it might be hard to break out. That is why Facebook has done some big changes in the past as well, not just incremental improvements
Maybe this is what makes the difference between statisticians trying to predict the election and the method used by "Trafalgar Group" who try to understand each states regulations and specifics to make rule based predictions, instead of extrapolating from a big pool of data. In two days we will know who was right.
[1] Pollster who predicted Trump's 2016 win makes 2020 prediction: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0BOhRCeoMzM
Quote from Wikipedia: > More recently, the law of unintended consequences has come to be used as an adage or idiomatic warning that an intervention in a complex system tends to create unanticipated and often undesirable outcomes.