Re:On Costliest U.S. Warship Ever, Navy Can’t Get Munitions ...
by el_benhameen on Tuesday July 30, 2019 @04:29PM
(#20568793)
This all seems fine to me, then. They can't get the bombs to the planes, but that's fine because the planes can't take off, which is fine because they couldn't land anyway.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:On Costliest U.S. Warship Ever, Navy Can’t Get Munitions ...
by weego on Tuesday July 30, 2019 @04:34PM
(#20568837)
Seems like a pretty decent take on an MVP to me. Ship it.
Re:On Costliest U.S. Warship Ever, Navy Can’t Get Munitions ...
by iseanstevens on Tuesday July 30, 2019 @05:31PM
(#20569413)
Literally, a ship.
Re:On Costliest U.S. Warship Ever, Navy Can’t Get Munitions ...
by thunderrabbit on Tuesday July 30, 2019 @05:15PM
(#20569248)
Oops! Wrong industry! /s
Re:On Costliest U.S. Warship Ever, Navy Can’t Get Munitions ...
by ianamartin on Tuesday July 30, 2019 @11:40PM
(#20571541)
We'l fix it later if the MVP proves that bombs, takeoffs, and landing are a good product-market fit.
Re:On Costliest U.S. Warship Ever, Navy Can’t Get Munitions ...
by FooHentai on Tuesday July 30, 2019 @11:50PM
(#20571580)
The wireframe prototype sank in testing, but we're confident the production version will float!