News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The rise of the indelibly-illustrated everyman by InitialLastName on Friday July 26, 2019 @04:16PM (#20538010)
I'd say that depends very much on who decides who deserves what.

Justice is inherently malleable and subjective. It's a thing we humans (as a society) decide to do to one another. As far as I can tell, it tends to lag the scales we're operating at.

Re:The rise of the indelibly-illustrated everyman by badpun on Saturday July 27, 2019 @03:47AM (#20540900)
I'm assuming it would happen automatically - i.e. people would be judged by all-knowing and impartial external parties (angels, aliens etc.) - otherwise of course it cannot happen, i.e. of course people alone can never implement true justice.

As for defining what is just - this is obviously a huge subject studied by philosophers - but I'm assuming that, if we had these all-knowing judges, they could just assess (by scanning thoughts of people) how hard everybody is trying to do good to others. And this way, we would be living in a just world. To repeat my question - would that be so bad?