Re:Europe heatwave breaks more temperature records
by estsauver on Thursday July 25, 2019 @10:41AM
(#20525752)
I think the thing that's hard about European heatwaves is the relative lack of air conditioning. In the US, it's been my experience that far more houses have an aircon than is typical in Europe.
We just broke down and bought an airconditioner for the office, we're working out of the library today. It's too hot to do work effectively right now.
Re:Europe heatwave breaks more temperature records
by autisticmind on Thursday July 25, 2019 @10:44AM
(#20525777)
Heres an official flightplan from an some acutall atmospheric programs. The last on the list just startet at 22.july.
If they test tropical aerosols, then its no wonder, why its so hot. Theres the list http://www.halo.dlr.de/
Re:Europe heatwave breaks more temperature records
by autisticmind on Thursday July 25, 2019 @11:46AM
(#20526382)
If they do research with tropic aerosols, yes. But if you klick on it, page not found. So, ant say it for 100%. There was a NASA takes it to the MAX jetfuelresearch, started Jan. 2018 over germany. They did nothing else, then testing different fuels, with different effect on atmosphere. https://www.nasa.gov/aero/nasa-takes-international-aviation-... I dont like these things, because they can cause unpredictable consequences.
Re:Europe heatwave breaks more temperature records
by jmcqk6 on Thursday July 25, 2019 @04:09PM
(#20529063)
Is there any more to this analysis than a correlation? I.E. That there was something that happened in the general area some time period ago?
I'm talking about things like thermodynamic carrying capacity, total mass of the test, prevailing wind patterns with estimates of where the aerosol might be now?
A simple bayesian analysis for the current facts: what's more likely to have caused the warming - a test that generated injected a small amount of mass into the air, or the massive increase of CO2 over the last several decades?
Based on these two comments, it seems like you're putting too much emphasis on correlation, and not enough analysis in to some actual thermodynamics.
If you do have access to deeper analysis, please post them. I would be interested in learning something new.
We just broke down and bought an airconditioner for the office, we're working out of the library today. It's too hot to do work effectively right now.
https://www.france24.com/en/20190725-europe-france-germany-h...
But Warsaw is 27C, Minsk 21C, Smolensk 18C, Moscow 22C. So not entire Europe is baking in heatwave only the Western part.
https://earth.nullschool.net/#current/wind/isobaric/500hPa/o...
The same circulation is responsible for chilly summer in Eastern Europe. So, not all bad.
And its actual and last program: http://www.halo.dlr.de/science/missions/southtrac/southtrac....
I'm talking about things like thermodynamic carrying capacity, total mass of the test, prevailing wind patterns with estimates of where the aerosol might be now?
A simple bayesian analysis for the current facts: what's more likely to have caused the warming - a test that generated injected a small amount of mass into the air, or the massive increase of CO2 over the last several decades?
Based on these two comments, it seems like you're putting too much emphasis on correlation, and not enough analysis in to some actual thermodynamics.
If you do have access to deeper analysis, please post them. I would be interested in learning something new.