Selective reporting or withholding of information is a form of bias.
Short selling is part of a functioning market. It's not some evil thing. It's one mechanism the financial world uses to gauge company value. I'm shocked every time I read this conspiracy theory on HN. The positions of these traders are public.
The only response to short sellers is to focus on your business. Responding with "it's a conspiracy" does not help your business.
But it doesn't matter what I write if ones only motivation is profit.
Try googling "why do markets allow short selling". First response [1]. tl;dr - short selling helps your retirement account & balances the market when there are bad actors, such as Enron.
> If it's healthy how do I profit from global climate disasters?
You're conflating things. Profit != world health.
Profit is just a human motivational tool, and money is paper trust. I wrote this software that helps your farming equipment run, and I need food. Money smooths these transactions so I don't need to trade goods-for-goods in every scenario.
I don't know how anyone could profit from hurting climate. Ultimately, destroying your environment destroys you. That's like kicking the amniotic sac open. Why do that? To the extent someone is so-motivated, I'd argue they're depressed, not profit-oriented.
> I'll just keep investing in prison companies for now. /s
I don't know whether that's possible for the average person. For a wealthy entity, it's still a risk, because that industry could disappear due to public pressure. Your money may have been better invested elsewhere.
[1] https://www.quora.com/Why-is-short-selling-legal-allowed
Very much a real phenomenon, hard to catch them and it's very lucrative.
Because apparently figuring out the basic business functions of your chosen industry is hell.
Responding in public fashion is a rational choice for TSLA to make assuming:
1) There exist short sellers who are willing to engage in malicious activities that hurt shareholder value
2) Publicizing their efforts to fight back against said actors acts as a deterrent for further malicious activity.
I don't know for sure, but I think there's a reasonable likelihood that both these statements are true.