News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Lockheed's Skunk Works Building Bigger Fusion Reactor by pfdietz on Saturday July 20, 2019 @10:17AM (#20485885)
The focus on ignition is strange. If the engineering and economics look hopeless, then why focus on ignition? The only reason I can think of is that the people working on it want to keep their jobs and defer the likely practical showstoppers until after the ultimately irrelevant plasma physics problems are solved.
Re:Lockheed's Skunk Works Building Bigger Fusion Reactor by graycat on Saturday July 20, 2019 @01:29PM (#20487103)
Global level strategy suspicion, guess: The US has to try because China, Russia, even North Korea, are trying and it just MIGHT work, or something from it might work and be the basis of something serious eventually.

Broad observation: Physical science research was a sleepy area until The Bomb. Then supposedly Ike with J. Conant, et al., said, IRCC, "Never again will US academics operate independent of the US military." Then the US Congress via the NSF and DoD went to the leading US research universities and "made them an offer they couldn't refuse" -- accept the grant money or cease to be a leading research university. And, oh, BTW, you can take 60% or so as overhead for the English department, the string quartet concerts, the little theater production, the glossy alumni magazine, the new front gate to the campus with the big, round fountain just inside, the new art gallery, a new, on campus, 6000 square foot Georgian house for the president with, of course, a black limo. Or some such!!!!

Then the bio-medical sciences mentioned to Congress that a big fraction of Members of Congress are old and need medical care for heart disease, cancer, other diseases of aging, etc. so should have, say, the NIH to do for bio-medical what the NSF does for the STEM fields. Congress went along.

Re:Lockheed's Skunk Works Building Bigger Fusion Reactor by Robotbeat on Saturday July 20, 2019 @04:14PM (#20488059)
If ignition hasn’t been achieved, why bother with clever engineering or economics? Without ignition/breakeven, the best engineering and economics in the world are irrelevant.

Ultimately, physics showstoppers matter more than any others.

Re:Lockheed's Skunk Works Building Bigger Fusion Reactor by tim333 on Saturday July 20, 2019 @11:00AM (#20486132)
Well it's a step in the direction. If you can get that to work then maybe you can then figure out the other stuff afterwards.
Re:Lockheed's Skunk Works Building Bigger Fusion Reactor by pfdietz on Saturday July 20, 2019 @11:54AM (#20486464)
In the same sense that climbing a tree is a step in the direction of getting to the moon.
Re:Lockheed's Skunk Works Building Bigger Fusion Reactor by gmueckl on Saturday July 20, 2019 @02:46PM (#20487570)
Climbing a tree is useful for going to the moon. Having access to heights from which to drop things is a prerequisite step for the first experiments that lead to an understanding of gravity and acceleration ;).
Re:Lockheed's Skunk Works Building Bigger Fusion Reactor by Robotbeat on Saturday July 20, 2019 @02:07PM (#20487330)
In the same sense that flying to orbit is a step to getting to the Moon. We did Mercury before Apollo.