News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Stunnel and Airline Wi-Fi by myrandomcomment on Saturday July 20, 2019 @10:10AM (#20485841)
The comment about the 24Mbps is pretty impressive. My experience every month on the JAL flights SF to Tokyo and Tokyo to $SomeOtherAsianCity is pretty crappy. I wonder if doing this it also bypasses some QoS filters? For example on a flight I tried to open the XM app on my iPad and could not stream a thing (it's pretty low but rate). Slack connects and disconnects all time. Email works but is slow. Webpages take minutes to load. Every flight for the last few years so...
Re:Stunnel and Airline Wi-Fi by UperSpaceGuru on Saturday July 20, 2019 @10:48AM (#20486057)
That’s because you’re traveling in airspace covered by different Satellite than the one that covers The American continent. Top speed should actually be ~74MBps.

I was one of the people who helped build the system (not at Viasat)

Re:Stunnel and Airline Wi-Fi by a012 on Saturday July 20, 2019 @11:07AM (#20486181)
It's almost a 1Gbps over sat link, are you correct?
Re:Stunnel and Airline Wi-Fi by UperSpaceGuru on Saturday July 20, 2019 @11:34AM (#20486366)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ViaSat-1

Apparently it’s been benchmarked doing even better speeds. There was supposed to be new satellites launched over Europe and Asia, but at the time, this was the fastest one.

Re:Stunnel and Airline Wi-Fi by jeffmcjunkin on Saturday July 20, 2019 @11:42AM (#20486404)
You're not far from agreeing with each other: (74 megabytes per second) / (1 gigabit per second) = 59.2 percent
Re:Stunnel and Airline Wi-Fi by kemitche on Saturday July 20, 2019 @10:27AM (#20485927)
I bet that viasat.com "connections" are given priority and not throttled for bandwidth - or perhaps since he never registered with the system, it never applied a throttle, under the assumption that blocking access negated the need for a throttle.