Re:Stunnel and Airline Wi-Fi
by myrandomcomment on Saturday July 20, 2019 @10:10AM
(#20485841)
The comment about the 24Mbps is pretty impressive. My experience every month on the JAL flights SF to Tokyo and Tokyo to $SomeOtherAsianCity is pretty crappy. I wonder if doing this it also bypasses some QoS filters? For example on a flight I tried to open the XM app on my iPad and could not stream a thing (it's pretty low but rate). Slack connects and disconnects all time. Email works but is slow. Webpages take minutes to load. Every flight for the last few years so...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Stunnel and Airline Wi-Fi
by UperSpaceGuru on Saturday July 20, 2019 @10:48AM
(#20486057)
That’s because you’re traveling in airspace covered by different Satellite than the one that covers The American continent. Top speed should actually be ~74MBps.
I was one of the people who helped build the system (not at Viasat)
It's almost a 1Gbps over sat link, are you correct?
Re:Stunnel and Airline Wi-Fi
by UperSpaceGuru on Saturday July 20, 2019 @11:34AM
(#20486366)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ViaSat-1
Apparently it’s been benchmarked doing even better speeds. There was supposed to be new satellites launched over Europe and Asia, but at the time, this was the fastest one.
Re:Stunnel and Airline Wi-Fi
by jeffmcjunkin on Saturday July 20, 2019 @11:42AM
(#20486404)
You're not far from agreeing with each other:
(74 megabytes per second) / (1 gigabit per second) =
59.2 percent
I bet that viasat.com "connections" are given priority and not throttled for bandwidth - or perhaps since he never registered with the system, it never applied a throttle, under the assumption that blocking access negated the need for a throttle.