News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Microsoft to Explore Using Rust by eklavya on Thursday July 18, 2019 @02:10PM (#20472454)
logic bugs + UI bugs + performance bugs < logic bugs + UI bugs + performance bugs + memory bugs

Just in this thread stats about memory bugs being 70% of CVEs is presented, so why do you believe "being memory safe doesn't get you much" ? I am not a Rust fanboy and would rather use a GCed language for most work. But I don't get this stubbornness towards progress and better tools. If some tool can make "your" life easier in many ways, use it for your own profit !!

Re:Microsoft to Explore Using Rust by la_barba on Thursday July 18, 2019 @06:30PM (#20474569)
Well, I'm not opposed to it, as much as I have yet to "see the light". I think that the the original non-trivial problem of deciding which thread or which subroutine gets to change what piece of memory at what time is still there. The original problem was a logic bug, but it manifests as a memory bug in C.

As an aside, I've recently been working with PLCs and I've come to respect a lot of the design elements of things like the Siemens GRAPH language which makes it easy to capture my intent for sequential control stuff.