Re:Amazon Accidentally Sold $13k Camera Gear for $100 on Pri...
by dvdbloc on Thursday July 18, 2019 @03:02AM
(#20467453)
I think it’s also proportional though. Like this amount of money isn’t even pennies to Amazon and I think people recognize that. If this was something much crazier, a mistake that could put Amazon out of business in the same way a financial mistake to an individual could make them homeless, I think at least more people second guess what they are doing.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Amazon Accidentally Sold $13k Camera Gear for $100 on Pri...
by Sherl on Thursday July 18, 2019 @03:22AM
(#20467548)
You know that you or me need to pay for those costs(losses) somehow?
Re:Amazon Accidentally Sold $13k Camera Gear for $100 on Pri...
by paulintrognon on Thursday July 18, 2019 @03:50AM
(#20467696)
We are aleardy paying /have already paid for those. The margin Amazon makes is (way) bigger than the losses they just had. So all the previous buyers that gave Amazon money and contributed to those margins "paid" for those cost, I think.
Re:Amazon Accidentally Sold $13k Camera Gear for $100 on Pri...
by sagebird on Thursday July 18, 2019 @10:20AM
(#20470033)
Dollars don’t really maintain identity when they are grouped into accounts and later withdrawn. There are different ways to do accounting, fifo, lifo etc, it’s mostly a construction ( though it is necessary to be consistent), not exactly “real”.
I would be less concerned about who paid for it, and more concerned on who would receive an effect as a result.