News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tesla drops cheapest Model X, S variants, cuts prices to ... by PinguTS on Tuesday July 16, 2019 @09:04AM (#20449611)
But don't use it to often in a row, because the battery will be getting hot and will limit the power output to level, which is way below any term related to performance.
Re:Tesla drops cheapest Model X, S variants, cuts prices to ... by vvanders on Tuesday July 16, 2019 @09:15AM (#20449686)
Unless you're on a track you won't be getting usage patterns that kick in thermal limiting.

If your planning on buying a car to track a 4 door, 5k lbs car isn't exactly the best choice.

Re:Tesla drops cheapest Model X, S variants, cuts prices to ... by lazerpants on Tuesday July 16, 2019 @11:06AM (#20450745)
Motor Trend's track test impression of the M3P was actually quite positive: "In our testing, we found the Model 3 Performance to be a joy around the track."

https://www.roadandtrack.com/new-cars/road-tests/a22625274/t...

Re:Tesla drops cheapest Model X, S variants, cuts prices to ... by zaroth on Tuesday July 16, 2019 @10:18AM (#20450233)
True for the old Model S, but not a factor on the Model 3 unless you are on the track.

Bjørn Nyland has an amazing series of EV videos (of course, mostly Tesla). He recently set the 24-hour EV range record, and has milllions of views. He's also funny as hell to listen ramble on and on.

Here is him trying to overheat a Tesla Model 3 [1], but you could spend an afternoon on his channel watching him drive around [2].

[1] - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4oeV0Cgyk0

[2] - https://www.youtube.com/user/bjornnyland/videos

Re:Tesla drops cheapest Model X, S variants, cuts prices to ... by Lendal on Tuesday July 16, 2019 @09:34AM (#20449851)
You have to be going ~160 mph for several minutes to induce the overheat power reduction mode. In the US it would take driving on an oval racetrack. I enjoy watching YouTube videos of people running these on German highways to get them to overheat. Those are quite fun videos to watch. I highly recommend.
Re:Tesla drops cheapest Model X, S variants, cuts prices to ... by Tomte on Tuesday July 16, 2019 @09:45AM (#20449938)
I would appreciate American tourists not to abuse the Autobahn as their racetrack.

And remember, even when there is no speed limit, Richtgeschwindigkeit is 80 mph, and if you're going faster, the judge will apportion more liability to you in case of an accident, even if you've driven perfectly.

Re:Tesla drops cheapest Model X, S variants, cuts prices to ... by PinguTS on Tuesday July 16, 2019 @10:03AM (#20450082)
May be not 160 mph, but I go 120 mph regularly. I don't need any Youtube for this.

BTW: Model S max speed is 155 mph.

Re:Tesla drops cheapest Model X, S variants, cuts prices to ... by dsfyu404ed on Tuesday July 16, 2019 @10:03AM (#20450081)
If you trash the aerodynamics (i.e. get a roof rack and put something on it) you can probably overheat it at normal highway speeds (i.e. 80mph) given a few miles of uphill.
Re:Tesla drops cheapest Model X, S variants, cuts prices to ... by leesec on Tuesday July 16, 2019 @10:20AM (#20450259)
This is a nice troll but yeah the Performance Model 3 is literally a supercar for 55k~.

I have the slow one and it's Very Performant, so much so that I rarely get a chance to use the speed.

Re:Tesla drops cheapest Model X, S variants, cuts prices to ... by supergauntlet on Tuesday July 16, 2019 @10:25AM (#20450308)
> literally a supercar for 55k~.

Sorry but this isn't accurate at all. It's an electric muscle car. It goes fast in a straight line and that's it. It can't corner, it can't sustain the acceleration for long periods of time due to overheating (which is completely reasonable - it wasn't designed for that), it's heavy as hell. It's just really really good at flooring it from a standstill or low speed, cruising, and highway acceleration (50 mph to 90 mph).

This isn't a knock on any Tesla, but they're grand tourers at best. Certainly not a supercar. You can't compare these with something that can actually corner at all.

Re:Tesla drops cheapest Model X, S variants, cuts prices to ... by zaroth on Tuesday July 16, 2019 @10:58AM (#20450660)
This is a fully stock (even tires) Tesla Model 3P running Laguna Seca in 1:46.1 at the end of a long day of racing BMWs. Just for fun the driver wanted to take his Telsa out, and his boss is riding shotgun. [1]

The production EV record is held by a non-stock TM3P (upgraded suspension, brakes, and tires) at 1:37.5 [2].

By comparison, here are a list of Laguna Seca records [3].

[1] - https://youtu.be/_DZSMxrHyHo

[2] - https://youtu.be/D1MDCPk-7Yw

[3] - https://i.imgsafe.org/7d/7d96bea0ab.png

Re:Tesla drops cheapest Model X, S variants, cuts prices to ... by supergauntlet on Tuesday July 16, 2019 @11:29AM (#20450993)
This is proving my point. Look at the lap times on Laguna.

https://fastestlaps.com/tracks/laguna-seca-post-1988

Most of the stuff around the 1:45-1:47 mark is a hot hatch, a grand tourer, or a muscle car.

Seriously, you gotta understand, I'm super hyped for the electric GT series with the Model S to take off, but these are not supercars. They're comparable to an M series BMW or a nice muscle car, which is fine.

Re:Tesla drops cheapest Model X, S variants, cuts prices to ... by zaroth on Tuesday July 16, 2019 @11:51AM (#20451197)
I’m not even disagreeing with you! “Supercar” is obviously a loaded term. I would never expect a fully stock $54k product to meet that label. IMO, if it’s not six figures it’s by definition excluded from even being considered in that group.

But 1:47 is with stock tires even. I don't know where you draw the line, if you are upgrading suspension parts and not just tires, rotors, and pads, but that’s still pretty basic kit to see 1:37, which does make it competitive with some supercars.

I’d like to see a time with TM3P just with racing tires, pads, and rotors, but stock suspension, if it can beat 1:40 on that chart.

By most accounts, the stock TM3P is ahead of the BMW M3 on the track, not just drag. It’s not a supercar, but it is the most super car you can get for $54k!

Re:Tesla drops cheapest Model X, S variants, cuts prices to ... by lazerpants on Tuesday July 16, 2019 @11:10AM (#20450782)
From the Motor Trend TM3P track test drive:

You'll kill me for saying it, but this sport sedan has the same toss and catch that makes the best front-drive hot hatches such a joy to hustle—bolstered by no-joke instant horsepower and the predictability of vectoring all-wheel drive.

Re:Tesla drops cheapest Model X, S variants, cuts prices to ... by supergauntlet on Tuesday July 16, 2019 @11:26AM (#20450952)
Hot hatches aren't supercars!

The instant acceleration and drag strip performance means it's closer to something like a Dodge Demon than a Ferrari 488. That's OK, it's just not realistic to say it's something it's not.

Re:Tesla drops cheapest Model X, S variants, cuts prices to ... by lazerpants on Tuesday July 16, 2019 @12:48PM (#20451687)
I don't think it's a supercar. But it handles better than a muscle car and you can absolutely compare it to something "that can actually corner at all" by looking at the list you posted at Laguna Seca. It's about 10 seconds slower than an AMG GT, which is certainly a supercar. Plus, most drivers are not going to be capable of taking either the AMG nor the M3P to the limit, so admittedly it's sort of a moot point.
Re:Tesla drops cheapest Model X, S variants, cuts prices to ... by lexs on Tuesday July 16, 2019 @10:35AM (#20450423)
Rimac would be the supercar equivalent for EVs I guess
Re:Tesla drops cheapest Model X, S variants, cuts prices to ... by ovi256 on Tuesday July 16, 2019 @10:52AM (#20450610)
That happens with ICE vehicles too, Grand Tour got several to overheat and go into "limp home" mode. They're also not designed to be run at a high load factor.
Re:Tesla drops cheapest Model X, S variants, cuts prices to ... by gruez on Tuesday July 16, 2019 @09:08AM (#20449635)
Sounds like how "turbo"/"boost" works on modern CPUs.
Re:Tesla drops cheapest Model X, S variants, cuts prices to ... by electriclove on Tuesday July 16, 2019 @09:47AM (#20449952)
I think that may have been the old S. The reports I've read have not seen that issue with the 3.