It wasn't always like this. I used to have a reasonably cool feed centered towards technologies and news that are at least partly relevant to me and my industry. No more. It's all 'I gave a homeless person lunch and today they are the #1 duck breeder in Brazil' or some other nonsense.
I don't know when this started or if it is localized, but it renders the 'place to find useful information' aspect of social media completely void. There's no amount of reasonable curating effort that will save a news feed like that.
I try not to be too negative about things but without some serious change I'll use a static LinkedIn profile and visit it for a fraction of a second every week - to check for messages - and nothing more.
WITH 12 DOLLARS IN YOUR POCKET
AND A WIFE AND KID BACK HOME......
A good running collection of the 'best' of LI. Not a great running collection, but a good enough one.
Usually the articles are about how they sent 200 applications and it was all worth it to get that one acceptance, or are re-share spam about some manager taking a chance on a new hire or some shit. I haven't done any work into curating my feed since I rarely scroll through my feed anyway, but I think LinkedIn could do much better at putting industry-related news articles or blogs in there with less perseverance-porn
Well actually the bragging here often doesn't even get a veneer of humbleness.
We developers have so many social networks to be found at - SO, github, angel.co, random reddit or discord groups.
But others don't, and linkedin provides amazing value for them as a place to advertise their skillset.
What I am saying is that after having used this thing for so long, I want to improve upon it. If it were open, like HN's Who's Hiring threads, I could just run a BigQuery job on it and do a sophisticated search for the candidates I want. I can maybe even do that and open it up for anyone to use, or sell it, whatever! It would provide value for people.
But the thing that sucks about LinkedIn, aside from the spam by their growth-at-all-costs team, aside from the 5 second page load time, forget the terrible caliber of thought leadership... the BIG THING that makes it really hard to use is their data, or what they expose of it. And I'm wondering if it's just because figuring out the true years of experience (or something else) of someone is too hard for all jobs, but I know some tricks I can use to gauge that for an engineer.
Because if I know everyone I'd want to hire is on the network, I would pay a lot of money to get full access on querying that data. But what LinkedIn has built for it is just sad. And the biggest barrier to building an amazing recruiter search tool is the fact that the entire network belongs to this giant corporation that isn't even doing a good job generating value from it!
So let's open it up!
There's no way to filter for people who have 10+ years' experience in software engineering roles. Or someone who has 5+ years' experience in CTO or VP Eng roles.
The problem is, "filtering" for jobs across multiple industries is harder than doing it for one industry.
Add to that the "thought leaders", the quotes and other FB-ish artefacts, without forgetting a constant stream of brown-nosing and if you have 20% of the content that is interesting, you can consider yourself lucky.
In contrast, I hang in an industry specific slack with folks all over the world and it's so much better. I don't have a solution to offer with regards to an open platform, but I think curated communities are the way to go.
Volunteers have to have somewhat cushy lives to be able to give their time and expertise for free. Stallman was willing to live by his ideals. He was also intermittently homeless while doing so.
These ideas of "We can rebuild it. We can make it better. We can also do it for free!" tend to be unrealistic fantasies.
I’m actually kind of interested in the people that have done “3000 applications etc etc.” The 100-300 applications are fairy common, but 3k?
Also, LinkedIn? more like LockedIn. There was a time where I enjoyed the service; I liked connecting with people doing interesting things from cool backgrounds.
But, I wonder if it hurts more than it helps... I feel like a lot of jobs are filled before they’re flown, every other job is meant for people who already have a job.
I like reading the job postings though; a lot of them are like non sequitur slam poetry.
This might be my naïveté (or the ipa), but I feel like it’d be cool to have a reversed scenario where I can get info on the team, the project, etc. before even reaching out (i.e. companies apply to individuals, but I think I may have reinvented recruiting? I know this may be unrealistic...)
Idk sometimes it feels like LinkedIn offers a non-service, talent will always be employed and/or sought; if everyone else is just a company’s 1000th pick aren’t they just wasting their time?
From LinkedIn's perspective, that's a feature, not a bug.
https://www.extremetech.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/micro...
I've been looking at LinkedIn with some immensely negative feelings for some time now. I've always wished someone would just disrupt the hell out of them, because they don't deserve the near-monopolistic position they're in. They just don't care about their users!
And before someone says, "well [pushes up glasses] their real users are recruiters that they sell $20k/year seats to their search tool". Yeah, as a hiring manager I've tried using it. Awful! :)
And jobs boards are nothing new, I guess, but something feels really nice about how much bigger these "Who is Hiring?" threads are getting on HN. Maybe we really do need a jobs-centric "social network" for industry verticals. Beyond terrible UX and general disrespect, LinkedIn also just doesn't do enough with their data to make it useable. Maybe that's because it's just too hard to do for every job and industry out there.
And maybe that next-gen professionals' social network can be the first open and free one?
Or maybe I'm just wishing too hard for something that can't/won't be done.