News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Cell Tower in the Swiss Alps Is Struck by Lightning Mor... by nine_k on Saturday July 13, 2019 @12:07PM (#20428718)
I bet cable maintenance in mountains costs more.
Re:A Cell Tower in the Swiss Alps Is Struck by Lightning Mor... by bastawhiz on Saturday July 13, 2019 @12:25PM (#20428804)
It's a cell tower. It needs cables anyway. And being a cell tower, it also likely needs to be fairly close to actual humans anyway, so the cables it needs likely aren't even that long.

Not to mention the one-off R&D investment you'd be making, along with all the specialty hardware (and its up-front costs), training, etc. involved in capturing lightning. The savings just isn't even remotely worth it.

Re:A Cell Tower in the Swiss Alps Is Struck by Lightning Mor... by reaperducer on Saturday July 13, 2019 @12:44PM (#20428892)
It's a cell tower. It needs cables anyway.

I've seen plenty of remote communications towers that do not have cables. Solar powered with generator backup and microwave relays to the next hop. It's SOP in the railroad industry, and how Sprint got its first backbone. (The "SPR" in "Sprint" is Southern Pacific Railroad.)

Re:A Cell Tower in the Swiss Alps Is Struck by Lightning Mor... by vvanders on Saturday July 13, 2019 @12:51PM (#20428934)
Yup, the local WISP does the same thing. Relay high up on the mountains and ptp link back to the main office.
Re:A Cell Tower in the Swiss Alps Is Struck by Lightning Mor... by rootsudo on Saturday July 13, 2019 @04:21PM (#20429935)
TIL. Wow!
Re:A Cell Tower in the Swiss Alps Is Struck by Lightning Mor... by DoreenMichele on Saturday July 13, 2019 @12:29PM (#20428827)
The savings just isn't even remotely worth it.

Except it would be new technology, could be patented etc.

It's mostly in fiction that fixing X for one person or situation doesn't proliferate into a new way to handle X altogether, and that's done in fiction so the storyline can save the day and then keep pretending we totally live in the same universe as actual reality.

Re:A Cell Tower in the Swiss Alps Is Struck by Lightning Mor... by thaumasiotes on Saturday July 13, 2019 @03:15PM (#20429659)
>> The savings just isn't even remotely worth it.

> Except it would be new technology, could be patented etc.

I don't think this works. New technology can only spread if it is worth it. Developing technology for the sake of having new technology is almost always worse than nothing; you would not expect it to proliferate into a new way to handle anything.

Re:A Cell Tower in the Swiss Alps Is Struck by Lightning Mor... by DoreenMichele on Saturday July 13, 2019 @03:20PM (#20429680)
My point is "If you think of it as just a solution for this one cell tower, sure, it's not worth it. But if you think of it as new technology that will be used in many situations, then development costs can make sense."

Of course, it doesn't guarantee success.

Re:A Cell Tower in the Swiss Alps Is Struck by Lightning Mor... by planteen on Saturday July 13, 2019 @01:37PM (#20429160)
Maybe, but lightning only occurs in warm months. If you are going off grid anyway, wouldn't you want something that works year round like wind or solar?