News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Malicious apps infect 25M Android devices with 'Agent Smi... by scarface74 on Thursday July 11, 2019 @12:31PM (#20412916)
Yet Apple has been able to do that for well over a decade and sells phones via carriers. Even if you buy an unlocked Android phone directly you can update it without carrier intervention.
Re:Malicious apps infect 25M Android devices with 'Agent Smi... by trevj on Thursday July 11, 2019 @01:44PM (#20413647)
Yes but apple only has ~10 phones that have to be updated at a time, and all share similar hardware with software specifically designed for that hardware. There are so many different hardware setups for android that getting software to work perfectly on all of them is exponentially harder
Re:Malicious apps infect 25M Android devices with 'Agent Smi... by supergeek133 on Thursday July 11, 2019 @12:47PM (#20413078)
Apple has much less risk surface/device variant.
Re:Malicious apps infect 25M Android devices with 'Agent Smi... by simonh on Thursday July 11, 2019 @12:55PM (#20413155)
OK, you're a carrier and have millions of Apple and Samsung devices on your network. 0.01% of your users know how to update the OS on their Samsung phones themselves, or jailbreak their iPhones. A software update from the manufacturer could brick millions of those phones on you network.

Which risk keeps you awake at night:

  A few Samsung phone users bricking their phones occasionally
  A few iPhone users bricking their phones occasionally
  50 million Galaxy phones being bricked by Samsung at once
  50 million iPhones being bricked by Apple at once
I'm not saying it's impossible Apple could do it, but in terms of ratios how much more or less likely is it versus Samsung?
Re:Malicious apps infect 25M Android devices with 'Agent Smi... by scarface74 on Thursday July 11, 2019 @03:16PM (#20414618)
What does jailbreaking phones have to do with updating them?