News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bjoern: A screamingly fast Python WSGI server written in C. by yashh on Friday December 24, 2010 @02:29AM (#2036815)
Ok took 30 minutes to run some benchmarks on a AWS instance. I used a small instance run a simple Flask Hello World app with gunicorn (1 worker and 4 workers) and bjoern. Frankly I was not able to fund any speed difference between both the servers. Here is the gist of the benchmark results

https://gist.github.com/753998

Re:Bjoern: A screamingly fast Python WSGI server written in C. by njharman on Friday December 24, 2010 @11:21AM (#2037441)
> n. Frankly I was not able to fund any speed difference between both the servers.

That is because of this http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2037060

Re:Bjoern: A screamingly fast Python WSGI server written in C. by est on Friday December 24, 2010 @08:32AM (#2037215)
Re:Bjoern: A screamingly fast Python WSGI server written in C. by jokull on Friday December 24, 2010 @04:12AM (#2036938)
What about memory consumption?
Re:Bjoern: A screamingly fast Python WSGI server written in C. by jgalvez on Friday December 24, 2010 @04:34AM (#2036966)
Is anyone else confused by "1 worker and 4 workers"?
Re:Bjoern: A screamingly fast Python WSGI server written in C. by oozcitak on Friday December 24, 2010 @06:19AM (#2037085)
He did 3 benchmarks: gunicorn with 1 worker process, gunicorn with 4 worker processes, bjoern.
Re:Bjoern: A screamingly fast Python WSGI server written in C. by yashh on Friday December 24, 2010 @10:46AM (#2037391)
Well I run gunicorn in production with 4 workers so just wanted to give it a try. Also I chose to add network latency by doing it on amazon instance.
Re:Bjoern: A screamingly fast Python WSGI server written in C. by thegoleffect on Friday December 24, 2010 @05:21AM (#2037015)
My guess is he meant 1 master & 4 workers.
Re:Bjoern: A screamingly fast Python WSGI server written in C. by baq on Friday December 24, 2010 @06:30AM (#2037094)
results look promising. has anyone tried WSGI on mongrel2?