Re:Bjoern: A screamingly fast Python WSGI server written in C.
by njharman on Friday December 24, 2010 @11:21AM
(#2037441)
> n. Frankly I was not able to fund any speed difference between both the servers.
That is because of this http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2037060
Re:Bjoern: A screamingly fast Python WSGI server written in C.
by est on Friday December 24, 2010 @08:32AM
(#2037215)
http://imilky.cn/blog/2010/12/2nd-python-wsgi-server-test/
Author of gevent commented on this guy's earlier benchmark test
Re:Bjoern: A screamingly fast Python WSGI server written in C.
by jokull on Friday December 24, 2010 @04:12AM
(#2036938)
What about memory consumption?
Re:Bjoern: A screamingly fast Python WSGI server written in C.
by jgalvez on Friday December 24, 2010 @04:34AM
(#2036966)
Is anyone else confused by "1 worker and 4 workers"?
Re:Bjoern: A screamingly fast Python WSGI server written in C.
by oozcitak on Friday December 24, 2010 @06:19AM
(#2037085)
He did 3 benchmarks: gunicorn with 1 worker process, gunicorn with 4 worker processes, bjoern.
Re:Bjoern: A screamingly fast Python WSGI server written in C.
by yashh on Friday December 24, 2010 @10:46AM
(#2037391)
Well I run gunicorn in production with 4 workers so just wanted to give it a try. Also I chose to add network latency by doing it on amazon instance.
Re:Bjoern: A screamingly fast Python WSGI server written in C.
by thegoleffect on Friday December 24, 2010 @05:21AM
(#2037015)
My guess is he meant 1 master & 4 workers.
https://gist.github.com/753998