"There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious way to do it."
But unless you also wish to argue that "there should be preferably only one programming language", it also follows that there are other sentiments upon which to base languages.
Here's one that seems to fit the continuing analogy: TMTOWTDI.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/There's_more_than_one_way_to_d...
Now, you may not like that one, and that's fair. I frankly like Python less the more I use it, but it still has its place in my toolkit.
I wasn't trying to say that there should only be one programming language, and I don't think it follows from the statement I quoted. I take it more like this: You use the correct tool for the job, and if there are inferior tools then just get rid of them.
In the context of the discussion, I happen to think that one packet filter/firewall in an OS is the correct number, unless each has significantly different uses. Such is not the case in FreeBSD.
The author never explains how 3 firewalls are bad. It seems this is probably some Linux hack trying to slander FreeBSD.