Except literally nobody will do that, except the caricatures in the fantasy of your own mind.
Not taking the position, but free market supporters typically point to regulations as the main reason why monopolies exist.
Contrast the treatment of monopoly in Marshall's Principles (the leading text from the 1880s through the 1940s) -- a full chapter, plus numerous other mentions -- with, say, Hazlitt's One Lesson, where it escapes mention entirely, save a note at the end. Hazlitt's book is corporate propaganda.
https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.217841/page/n5...
https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.217841/page/n9...
https://fee.org/resources/economics-in-one-lesson/ 9full text in one page)
Yes, I do agree. For example, we should stop threatening media platforms like Facebook and Google with regulations that would put any competitor out of business, either because the regulations are so onerous or because the regulations are so unimaginative that they accidentally rule out perfectly viable, and better, business models.
Perhaps we could enact a law that prevented regulation of most markets.
Is this really what we've sunk to? Is this really what everyone thinks? Are we so jaded by the failures of our economic system we can't even tell when it's falling apart?
Surely, even the most staunch supporter of the free market can admit that at a bare minimum, capitalism in this country is in desperate need of better anti-trust regulation to stop monopolies from crushing all competition. Surely we can admit that simply making a bunch of tech startups with weird website URLs is not going to fix the economy by themselves, and might even be making the problem worse.
Of course, given that we can't even agree that global warming is a problem as the arctic permafrost melts, I'm not particularly hopeful.