Re:American Suburbs Swell Again as a New Generation Escapes ...
by ikeyany on Tuesday July 02, 2019 @10:16AM
(#20335347)
Both can be true. Portland has some nasty parts (inner downtown, anywhere near a trail or a body of water) that are riddled with needles or feces, but there are also some very nice parts like the suburbs or anywhere that can afford private security.
Re:American Suburbs Swell Again as a New Generation Escapes ...
by loco5niner on Tuesday July 02, 2019 @11:23AM
(#20335998)
I live just outside Portland, and the homeless problem is MUCH worse here than it was 10 years ago. For one more data point....
Re:American Suburbs Swell Again as a New Generation Escapes ...
by jcims on Tuesday July 02, 2019 @08:44AM
(#20334445)
My quick hack for plausibly quantifiable info is to do a google image search and scan through the charts to find a trend.
Re:American Suburbs Swell Again as a New Generation Escapes ...
by ff10 on Tuesday July 02, 2019 @08:35AM
(#20334377)
Take a guess.
Re:American Suburbs Swell Again as a New Generation Escapes ...
by drdeadringer on Tuesday July 02, 2019 @11:08AM
(#20335846)
For my own clarity: Do you intend more of a "flip a coin" meaning or more of a "we should inherently already know what the answer is" meaning?
My density today is more than average.
As someone who has never been to the city - not 20, 10, or 0 years ago - how should I go about verifying which one is "more true"?