Re:Hey advertisers, track this
by XorNot on Wednesday June 26, 2019 @08:11AM
(#20284141)
Also paying for things has a low success rate in reducing advertising - a customer who will pay for something is a good target to advertise more too.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Agreed, see basic cable tv
Paywalls are a great alternative to intrusive ads for a larger publisher. NYT has been doing very well the last couple of years on their digital subscription model.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/01/business/media/new-york-t...
Your point may be valid, but the NYT is a poor example of paywalls as an alternative to intrusive ads.
I'm a paying subscriber to the NYT. When I open their homepage now, the page is split horizontally with an ad taking up about 40%-50% of the entire screen. The "The New York Times" header is about halfway down the page, and the first actual content probably starts at 85% or even below that.
Anecdotally, the NYT runs even more intrusive ads than this to paid subscribers. Off the top of my head, I would say their modal popup video ad is the worst.
For the past few days I’ve also been unable to read articles on the NYT app without the page jumping around to load ads as I scroll. And I’m a subscriber to boot. I’ve a Pihole on the network and it still isn’t a tolerable experience.