I do however see 'dont be snarky'.
Are you sure you are not picking your favorite position in the argument, and reffering the opposing perspective as "not in line with the guidelines"?
The thing is, even if someone else was being unkind, you still have to follow the site guidelines in how you respond.
Same goes to this conversation. While you attack me personally I just address your points.
You can choose to "win" the argument, or you can choose to learn.
> I quoted it to make a point not to take a stab at him.
"For JS projects, we ask candidates to use immutable.js, which has 27k stars on github, which most wont' consider as obscure"
vs.
"... the “obscure” library is immutable.js, one with _mere_ (emphasis mine) 27k+ stars on github."
Quotes are used for snark in this context, and you know this as well as I do.
I was trying to address the two points he made for other candidates. He used strong language and I just addressed his exact words.
As you said, in your earlier comment, we would not work well together.
I am glad that I don't interact with you regularly.