Why?
Yes personal data protection it's a good thing to think about, maybe not the highest prio problem though.
We call it Sandy with special offers. If you'd like to pay extra you can get a special-offer-free experience. If you don't like the idea of any data collection you can just buy a cat litter box and have your own Sandy (without the added features).
Don't see how this is an issue.
Your toilet startup has a website?
(Websearching a bit, seems normal toilet water usage is 30 - 100 liter water a day, sounds like a lot to me.)
Do you really see the 'climate change era' providing robust enough infrastructure that we'll still be kitted out with smartphones?
Seems to me yes people can have mobile phones, and still no water. Have a look at this comment by someone who apparently lives? has lived? in the relevant areas:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20260143
> A good part of people seem destitute, yet they have good mobile phones.
Inexpensive mobile phonoes aren't that expensive and where I live also the beggars have phones. To me seems realistic with a future where everyone is conneted with a phone, and at the same time starving and being ill because of polluted water (or no water).
We already see metals being harvested from infrastructure. I expect that to get worse -- and worse faster in more impoverished areas. It seems to me that the remaining hospitable climes will face increasing pressures on their resources, and the luxury of nearly-free electricity powering smartphones will be fleeting.
At the same time, shipping phones to far away places where there is a "shortage" of phones, and selling them there, is going to be more profitable, per shipment, than shipping water to that same place.
And one needs just a few shipments of phones, for everyone to have a phone. One ships just 0.1 kg phone per person, once. Compared to 10 or 100 kg water per person and day.
With that in mind, I'm thinking phones will continue to be prevalent, in comparison to water, in areas where there's a drought.