News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Google+ Failed by mekoka on Thursday June 20, 2019 @03:17AM (#20230630)
That's not fair. Medium's content is community contributed. There's a lot of value in there. Let's not throw the baby with the water.
Re:Why Google+ Failed by tastroder on Thursday June 20, 2019 @03:30AM (#20230705)
That community of content creators chose the platform for the benefits of discovery, SEO and convenience. While I agree that there's great content on Medium, those upsides come with a few downsites for content consumers and losing a few of them comes with the territory. It's still a net positive for creators anyway, otherwise Medium wouldn't be a thing.
Re:Why Google+ Failed by notatoad on Thursday June 20, 2019 @03:23AM (#20230651)
if the author cares so little about their readers that they choose to distribute their content on medium, there's a good chance that content isn't worth reading.
Re:Why Google+ Failed by mekoka on Thursday June 20, 2019 @03:51AM (#20230802)
An author may care so much about readership that they value reaching 50 million people, over a few dozens, if the price to pay is some inconvenience with the medium (see what I did there?)
Re:Why Google+ Failed by skribbj on Thursday June 20, 2019 @03:28AM (#20230687)
What's so bad about it?
Re:Why Google+ Failed by wtmt on Thursday June 20, 2019 @05:58AM (#20231321)
One easy way to communicate to said community that Medium provides a terrible experience for readers is by reducing page visits so that they start wondering about it and look for alternatives.