News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on San Francisco officials advance bill to ban e-cigarettes.

Re:San Francisco officials advance bill to ban e-cigarettes by himynameisdom on Tuesday June 18, 2019 @09:14AM (#20212583)
Ban e-cigarettes until they're reviewed by governing bodies. Continue to sell combustibles that've already received a negative health review for both those who consume them and those in the general inhalation vicinity by said governing bodies.

Makes sense.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:San Francisco officials advance bill to ban e-cigarettes by ngcc_hk on Tuesday June 18, 2019 @09:20AM (#20212632)
It seems a common strategy. It should put in the same regime as combustible. For walking in the street, it definitely cleaner.

Yes it still kills and affect the health of the human. But nothing is worse than combustible.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:San Francisco officials advance bill to ban e-cigarettes by himynameisdom on Wednesday June 19, 2019 @10:06AM (#20223449)
Why should it be put in the same regime as a combustible if you believe nothing is worse than combustible? Trying to follow your logic here.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:San Francisco officials advance bill to ban e-cigarettes by turbo_fart_box on Tuesday June 18, 2019 @04:23PM (#20217989)
Source that vaping kills?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:San Francisco officials advance bill to ban e-cigarettes by lunias on Thursday June 20, 2019 @04:40PM (#20237128)
Source that second hand vaping kills? I mean, I can legally drink all the bleach I want so long as I don't go around splashing it on others.
[ Parent | on HN ]