News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:San Francisco officials advance bill to ban e-cigarettes by himynameisdom on Tuesday June 18, 2019 @09:14AM (#20212583)
Ban e-cigarettes until they're reviewed by governing bodies. Continue to sell combustibles that've already received a negative health review for both those who consume them and those in the general inhalation vicinity by said governing bodies.

Makes sense.

Re:San Francisco officials advance bill to ban e-cigarettes by ngcc_hk on Tuesday June 18, 2019 @09:20AM (#20212632)
It seems a common strategy. It should put in the same regime as combustible. For walking in the street, it definitely cleaner.

Yes it still kills and affect the health of the human. But nothing is worse than combustible.

Re:San Francisco officials advance bill to ban e-cigarettes by himynameisdom on Wednesday June 19, 2019 @10:06AM (#20223449)
Why should it be put in the same regime as a combustible if you believe nothing is worse than combustible? Trying to follow your logic here.
Re:San Francisco officials advance bill to ban e-cigarettes by turbo_fart_box on Tuesday June 18, 2019 @04:23PM (#20217989)
Source that vaping kills?
Re:San Francisco officials advance bill to ban e-cigarettes by lunias on Thursday June 20, 2019 @04:40PM (#20237128)
Source that second hand vaping kills? I mean, I can legally drink all the bleach I want so long as I don't go around splashing it on others.
Re:San Francisco officials advance bill to ban e-cigarettes by gnulinux on Tuesday June 18, 2019 @09:21AM (#20212647)
Ban cigarettes or legalize all drugs. The hypocrisy is strong in our drug policy. I personally support legalizing all drugs, or at least decriminalizing them, but I can't stand the fact that cigarettes are legal+easily accessible when weed is federally Schedule 1 drug.

EDIT: Full disclosure: I was a daily cigarette smoker for ~1 year during high school.

Re:San Francisco officials advance bill to ban e-cigarettes by someonehere on Tuesday June 18, 2019 @11:53AM (#20214455)
The thing people don’t realize is this. E-cigarettes cut into the tax revenue regular cigarettes generate.

Of course SF wants to ban e-cigs as it cuts into the tax generated from cigarettes.

Someone pointed this out to me. Part of the settlement with big tobacco was big tobacco had to run ads to get people to stop smoking, and to allow states and cities to tax tobacco as warranted.

It’s free money for cities and states. If you think they would genuinely ever ban cigarettes you’re gravely mistaken.