Re:The Pentagon is battling the clock to fix serious, unrepo...
by Gibbon1 on Thursday June 13, 2019 @04:44AM
(#20172842)
Be happy. The F35's going to be used about 2/3 less because it costs about three times more to fly.
Re:The Pentagon is battling the clock to fix serious, unrepo...
by hutzlibu on Thursday June 13, 2019 @06:54AM
(#20173510)
Yes, thats why more and more drones will be the cheap replacement. And in a not so distant future .. we might probably see a swarm of cheap drones just overwhelm that awesome F35
Re:The Pentagon is battling the clock to fix serious, unrepo...
by ceejayoz on Thursday June 13, 2019 @08:41AM
(#20174185)
Part of the goal of the F-35 is to serve as a mini-AWACS command and control aircraft for groups of drones.
Re:The Pentagon is battling the clock to fix serious, unrepo...
by CapricornNoble on Thursday June 13, 2019 @12:59PM
(#20176685)
A big reason why casualty rates in wars have steadily declined is BECAUSE modern weaponry is so efficient.
Re:The Pentagon is battling the clock to fix serious, unrepo...
by scotty79 on Thursday June 13, 2019 @03:55PM
(#20178073)
Just own casualties or total casualties on both sides of the conflict?
Re:The Pentagon is battling the clock to fix serious, unrepo...
by CapricornNoble on Sunday June 16, 2019 @02:16AM
(#20194104)
Total casualties. Even civilian "collateral damage" casualties are like an order of magnitude lower than they were in WW2. Bombing raids used to kill tens of thousands of civilians in a single night. Bombs were so inaccurate the only way to ensure you hit the target was to employ them en masse.
Now, we can hit a single building with a handful of guided bombs or cruise missiles and civilian losses are typically in the double digits.
I'm actually quite happy that they are focusing on theoretical weapon F35, not a practical upgrade to a practical weapon.
I'm hoping theoretical weapon will be used less. I think modern weaponary is so muderous that we should be focusing more on its role as a deterrent (in which being hyperadvanced might help) not the practical aspects (how efficiently it helps people to kill people when in use).