News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Owning nothing is now a luxury, thanks to a number of sub... by arcticbull on Monday June 10, 2019 @10:58PM (#20152739)
I could make a case for the opposite -- consumers tend to buy something new at the store then throw it out a couple of years later. I can imagine these types of companies buying more durable goods so they can rent them out to multiple people back to back instead. I see it as almost automating the craigslist model.
Re:Owning nothing is now a luxury, thanks to a number of sub... by benatkin on Monday June 10, 2019 @11:41PM (#20152863)
They can calculate how long rented equipment lasts, and at least for electric scooters, the time they last is pretty short. 28.8 days and 92 trips. I don't know how long the average non-shared scooter lasts but if I paid $300+ for my own electric scooter I'd want it to last much longer and go on more trips than that. https://qz.com/1561654/how-long-does-a-scooter-last-less-tha...
Re:Owning nothing is now a luxury, thanks to a number of sub... by mc32 on Monday June 10, 2019 @11:04PM (#20152755)
Time will tell, of course.

You might be right... but I’m pessimistic here. Renters and leasees take less good care of the items they let or rent. The clothes will have a faster velocity to the waste dump, etc. manufacturers and purveyors will cater to this increased velocity...

People are worried about drinking straws. Imagine all the new plastic items to cater to this new usage pattern...

Re:Owning nothing is now a luxury, thanks to a number of sub... by ianschenck on Monday June 10, 2019 @11:16PM (#20152793)
As someone who just recently stopped being a "landlord"...I very much agree that renters put a magnitude more wear and tear on things. The wear and tear people put on things when they don't own them...and without even being consciously aware of it.

I know now that anything rented should maximize durability while minimizing cost. Time will tell which one weighs heavier, but I'm pessimistic also, and guess that minimizing cost is overall cheaper than durability.

Re:Owning nothing is now a luxury, thanks to a number of sub... by arcticbull on Tuesday June 11, 2019 @12:02AM (#20152925)
Indeed, and the difference with the "craigslist" model is I'm incentivized to keep the value of my goods as high as possible to maximize my return. Rental, I'm incentivized only to keep it in "good enough" shape the owner will take it back. Maybe some sort of value-share program where you get a rebate on your rental fees the better condition you keep your stuff? Aligned interests, and still automated.
Re:Owning nothing is now a luxury, thanks to a number of sub... by flukus on Tuesday June 11, 2019 @12:26AM (#20153006)
Considering the way people often abuse rentals I think the extra durability will mostly cancel out and there are other costs like energy efficiency that I doubt they will optimize for the end user.

It may be a boon for repair-ability though if they see it's economical to have in house fixers.

Re:Owning nothing is now a luxury, thanks to a number of sub... by Loughla on Tuesday June 11, 2019 @09:46AM (#20155328)
>I can imagine these types of companies buying more durable goods so they can rent them out to multiple people back to back instead

Again, Rent-A-Center has existed for decades already, and their goods are certainly not more durable than standard consumer goods.