News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why GitHub used Haskell for Semantic by solidsnack9000 on Thursday June 06, 2019 @10:22PM (#20121128)
No one is arguing that you need to be a genius to use Haskell. How does my argument come across that way?
Re:Why GitHub used Haskell for Semantic by yakshaving_jgt on Friday June 07, 2019 @02:45AM (#20122203)
> No one is arguing that you need to be a genius to use Haskell.

I’ve come across this sentiment so many times. Haskell definitely has a reputation for being an “ivory tower” language.

> How does my argument come across that way?

I’m not too familiar with Zelda, but it sounded like you were saying “some people are just able to do these things that most others can’t.”

If that isn’t what you were saying, then I am sorry for misinterpreting. I’m genuinely not trying to argue or take you out of context or anything like that.

Re:Why GitHub used Haskell for Semantic by solidsnack9000 on Sunday June 09, 2019 @11:13AM (#20139713)
I think anybody can write Haskell and anybody can play Zelda or similar characters in fighting games.

What the skill-cap / skill-floor thing is about, is how often do people bother. When the base level of skill required to play at all -- not necessarily play well -- is really high, often those characters don't get used as much. People find a character that demands less up front investment and play that character instead. It's not about ability, it's about time.

Re:Why GitHub used Haskell for Semantic by yakshaving_jgt on Monday June 10, 2019 @08:26AM (#20146058)
Ok, I think that's fair. I won't deny there was a significant time investment on my end.

Thanks for clarifying.