News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why aren’t more companies remote-first? by bobthepanda on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @11:47AM (#20105611)
I don’t get why it’s always presented as cubicle farm vs fully open floor. My company uses semi-open offfices; you have an open office with 8-10 people in a team, but don’t share space with other teams. So it’s access to the people you work with directly and no more.
Re:Why aren’t more companies remote-first? by donretag on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @01:05PM (#20106560)
This setup is my favorite, although I have worked in offices of 3-6.
Re:Why aren’t more companies remote-first? by WalterSear on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @11:57AM (#20105709)
That's still an open office.
Re:Why aren’t more companies remote-first? by rpedela on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @01:05PM (#20106552)
Technically yes, but it feels very different to an open office with 50 people in it. <=10 is small enough that everyone is able to respect each others' privacy, noise, etc while still enjoying some of the benefits of an open office such as turn-your-chair-around collaboration. I think we need a new term for when <=10 people are in an open office. It just isn't the same as what is usually referred to when someone says "open office".
Re:Why aren’t more companies remote-first? by WalterSear on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @01:17PM (#20106721)
It is exactly what people are referring to when they say 'open office'. What we need is a word for offices with 50 people in them.
Re:Why aren’t more companies remote-first? by chimeracoder on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @01:28PM (#20106865)
> It is exactly what people are referring to when they say 'open office'. What we need is a word for offices with 50 people in them.

Those have historically been called "bullpen offices".

Re:Why aren’t more companies remote-first? by rpedela on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @01:49PM (#20107127)
It really isn't. Most people are thinking of this: https://blog.nuclino.com/files/9f08086a-9bde-4d95-929a-f7f2c...
Re:Why aren’t more companies remote-first? by geekbird on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @06:32PM (#20109803)
No, open offices resemble sweatshops, 50+ people per floor with no doors, privacy, or noise barriers.
Re:Why aren’t more companies remote-first? by geekbird on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @06:31PM (#20109794)
That's the "team room" concept - each team has an "open office", but it's not open to all the noise from everyone else. There's a door for when the team is heads down on stuff.
Re:Why aren’t more companies remote-first? by poslathian on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @12:49PM (#20106352)
I work in a 10 person open office with lots of separation - 1200sqft, 7 would be better but there is no comparison to a 50 person bullpen with everyone within arms reach of another.
Re:Why aren’t more companies remote-first? by bosie on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @01:00PM (#20106486)
What is the room layout of this setup? A dedicated room with 8-10 people in them where you close the door for quietness?
Re:Why aren’t more companies remote-first? by bobthepanda on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @03:26PM (#20108208)
Every team on the floor is in a semi-enclosed room with an opening into the hallway (no door).

In practice noise doesn't really leak from rooms into the hallway, so it's not a problem most of the time unless something extremely loud is happening, like a dog acting up or someone building flatpack furniture.