Re:Why aren’t more companies remote-first?
by WalterSear on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @11:57AM
(#20105709)
That's still an open office.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why aren’t more companies remote-first?
by rpedela on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @01:05PM
(#20106552)
Technically yes, but it feels very different to an open office with 50 people in it. <=10 is small enough that everyone is able to respect each others' privacy, noise, etc while still enjoying some of the benefits of an open office such as turn-your-chair-around collaboration. I think we need a new term for when <=10 people are in an open office. It just isn't the same as what is usually referred to when someone says "open office".
Re:Why aren’t more companies remote-first?
by WalterSear on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @01:17PM
(#20106721)
It is exactly what people are referring to when they say 'open office'. What we need is a word for offices with 50 people in them.
Re:Why aren’t more companies remote-first?
by chimeracoder on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @01:28PM
(#20106865)
> It is exactly what people are referring to when they say 'open office'. What we need is a word for offices with 50 people in them.
Those have historically been called "bullpen offices".
Re:Why aren’t more companies remote-first?
by rpedela on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @01:49PM
(#20107127)
It really isn't. Most people are thinking of this: https://blog.nuclino.com/files/9f08086a-9bde-4d95-929a-f7f2c...