News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Amazon defeated Rekognition shareholder revolt by a large... by freeopinion on Wednesday May 29, 2019 @02:29PM (#20043668)
I'm not arguing for or against computers vs humans, but your argument is puzzling to me.

Computer systems are accountable, changeable, and cross-examinable. Arguably more so than humans.

I do stipulate that computer systems can be racist or otherwise biased and can be "just wrong".

Re:Amazon defeated Rekognition shareholder revolt by a large... by ddxxdd on Wednesday May 29, 2019 @02:36PM (#20043754)
I fully agree; a neural network can be continuously trained. Software can continuously perform A/B testing and change its mind when its current procedure proves inefficient.

The human mind tends to be set in its ways.

Re:Amazon defeated Rekognition shareholder revolt by a large... by freeone3000 on Wednesday May 29, 2019 @03:46PM (#20044530)
But it doesn't. Current systems do not do this, but people trust in them because machine learning is "more accurate", somehow. It's a huge problem managing expectations around a black box. Online training does not happen in any form at scale. These "fair" systems are, by and large, nonsense.