News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Scrum is fragile, not Agile by tomjakubowski on Sunday May 26, 2019 @08:00PM (#20018449)
It's not like it's a requirement that "managers" be at a standup meeting. Some of the best teams I've worked on have done daily standups without managers, and I dare to say most of us enjoyed them and found them productive!
Re:Scrum is fragile, not Agile by asark on Sunday May 26, 2019 @09:00PM (#20018687)
Managers are often looking for ways to fill their calendar. Meetings, calls that could be a two-minute Slack exchange, et c. Some will hop into meetings like that if they can. They love the recurring ones, especially, bonus if they can apologize any time they have to skip it for something that actually, maybe, matters ("uh, yeah, we don't care if you come, OK, thanks for apologizing I guess?")
Re:Scrum is fragile, not Agile by mcv on Monday May 27, 2019 @09:08AM (#20021856)
I have never been in a team where managers were present at the standup meeting. In fact, sometimes I have no idea who my "manager" even is. We've got a team, we've got stakeholders, we do the work. If a manager wants to join, that's fine, but he's not in charge of that meeting.

All this talk of standup meetings being primarily for managers is really weird. It's not for managers, and they have no reason to be present. It's for the team, to improve cooperation within the team. If the team has a better way to accomplish that, then they should use that.