Re:Maker of US border's license-plate scanning tech ransacke...
by azinman2 on Friday May 24, 2019 @11:53AM
(#20002793)
You think people voting on vendors would somehow result in less data leaks?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Maker of US border's license-plate scanning tech ransacke...
by module0000 on Friday May 24, 2019 @11:53AM
(#20002798)
It would result in us not approving the project/vendor at all.
edit: We(citizens) don't like being spied on, and it just rubs salt in the wound that we have to pay for it.
Re:Maker of US border's license-plate scanning tech ransacke...
by jstanley on Friday May 24, 2019 @11:54AM
(#20002805)
Given that this is literally only useful for tracking people, not approving the project would be ideal.
Re:Maker of US border's license-plate scanning tech ransacke...
by Retra on Friday May 24, 2019 @12:22PM
(#20003080)
Tracking people is like 90% of what every organization does. It's why we have names, phone numbers, addresses, id numbers, license plates, etc. "Tracking people = bad" is an untenable assumption.
Re:Maker of US border's license-plate scanning tech ransacke...
by savethefuture on Friday May 24, 2019 @12:40PM
(#20003244)
Well go ahead and dox yourself right here for us.
Re:Maker of US border's license-plate scanning tech ransacke...
by Retra on Friday May 24, 2019 @01:13PM
(#20003490)
Perhaps I'm not being clear. "Tracking people involuntarily" might be bad. "Tracking people unnecessarily" might be bad. But they will be bad because they are involuntary and unnecessary, not because they are tracking people.
Re:Maker of US border's license-plate scanning tech ransacke...
by komali2 on Friday May 24, 2019 @01:17PM
(#20003522)
Ok, I argue then that all tracking of people is unnecessary.
Re:Maker of US border's license-plate scanning tech ransacke...
by Retra on Friday May 24, 2019 @01:29PM
(#20003616)
Are you going to actually argue it, or are you just going to tease? It means nothing to me that you would disagree in some vague manner.
Re:Maker of US border's license-plate scanning tech ransacke...
by stale2002 on Friday May 24, 2019 @03:20PM
(#20004529)
My username is associated with my real life identity and would be trivial for people to look me up.
I am already "doxxed" and it doesn't bother me.
Re:Maker of US border's license-plate scanning tech ransacke...
by torified on Sunday May 26, 2019 @12:16AM
(#20013094)
I don't see it anywhere. Where does it list your personal info?
Re:Maker of US border's license-plate scanning tech ransacke...
by stale2002 on Sunday May 26, 2019 @04:40PM
(#20017361)
It's easily googleable, man. In 5 minutes you could find my LinkedIn info, and then know exactly who I am and where I work.
Re:Maker of US border's license-plate scanning tech ransacke...
by bqqyz on Friday May 24, 2019 @12:05PM
(#20002925)
If you think 0% of the citizenry supports scanning licence plates that cross the border, I have bad news for you.
Re:Maker of US border's license-plate scanning tech ransacke...
by dsfyu404ed on Friday May 24, 2019 @12:39PM
(#20003235)
The overwhelming majority of people are probably ok with recording plates at the border. If it's confined to the border it's not really any different than the customs agent jotting down your license plate. It's also not really "tracking", it's just a record created at that single point. It's the whole network that makes it "tracking"
It's the record keeping everywhere else and tracking that that enables that's not ok.
Re:Maker of US border's license-plate scanning tech ransacke...
by sneak on Friday May 24, 2019 @02:03PM
(#20003903)
Jotting down on paper is not the same as aggregated and uploaded to an open ftp server.