News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Goldman Sachs, Patagonia, and the Mysteries of “Business ... by chrisseaton on Thursday May 23, 2019 @05:37AM (#19990052)
Of course tech companies have their own unwritten dress codes, which is also unfair to people. If you wore a suit to a Google office you’d a get similar reaction of ‘this person doesn’t get it’ as you would wearing the wrong thing at Goldman Sachs. The situation hasn’t really improved in terms of making expectations plainly understood.
Re:Goldman Sachs, Patagonia, and the Mysteries of “Business ... by DisruptiveDave on Thursday May 23, 2019 @09:13AM (#19991393)
I think calling it "unfair" is, well, unfair. There are thousands of "unwritten" rules in this world that exist for a bunch of reasons. If you don't pick up on obvious social cues, then you'd likely feel some sort of way about the result, and you'd likely be more aware next time to avoid that feeling. That process is necessary in this world. It sharpens you. It forces you to grow and adapt and learn new skills.
Re:Goldman Sachs, Patagonia, and the Mysteries of “Business ... by chrisseaton on Thursday May 23, 2019 @09:31AM (#19991579)
Here's a concrete example.

When you interview at Google, I think you're told 'dress as you're comfortable'. But really that's bad advice, as if you're most comfortable in a suit and wear that you're going to be getting it wrong.

It would be more fair if they said 'most people wear jeans and hoodies'. 'Wear whatever you want' is what they want to be but not the reality. 'Wear a hoodie' is the reality.

Re:Goldman Sachs, Patagonia, and the Mysteries of “Business ... by ghaff on Thursday May 23, 2019 @09:55AM (#19991803)
>you're going to be getting it wrong

Genuinely curious. Are you saying that if you wear a suit to an interview at Google, you're going to be automatically dinged and not hired because of what you're wearing? I admittedly don't interview candidates for engineering positions at my company, but I can't imagine marking someone down for wearing a suit even though you basically never see anyone in a suit day-to-day in the office.

Re:Goldman Sachs, Patagonia, and the Mysteries of “Business ... by mercutio2 on Thursday May 23, 2019 @11:24AM (#19992594)
I have literally listened to a senior VP laugh about a candidate after the interviews were done, during the hire/no hire discussion, for wearing a suit to an interview, and ultimately we turned the candidate down.

In that specific case the candidate might not have been hired, anyway, they were pretty marginal. But it is 100% a real thing that Bay Area tech people will ding you for wearing a suit to an interview.

Re:Goldman Sachs, Patagonia, and the Mysteries of “Business ... by chrisseaton on Thursday May 23, 2019 @10:05AM (#19991902)
Have you never heard people joke about and dismiss people in the tech industry because they're wearing suits? I have.

I don't think there's literally a box on the feedback form that says 'were they dressed appropriately', but I think it's part of the impression people will form of you and will judge you by.

Re:Goldman Sachs, Patagonia, and the Mysteries of “Business ... by ghaff on Thursday May 23, 2019 @10:10AM (#19991950)
I have certainly heard the term "suits" used dismissively and generically in the same unthinking way as "pointy haired boss" etc. gets used.

But, no, I don't think I've ever heard someone comment about an individual being "overdressed" in a negative way. But then I don't work in Silicon Valley.

Re:Goldman Sachs, Patagonia, and the Mysteries of “Business ... by asdffdsa on Thursday May 23, 2019 @01:00PM (#19993531)
The whole point of culture is that its not "obvious" if you're outside it. Hence the last several decades of discussion around corporate culture, institutional racism, etc. Calling it obvious makes you seem kind of tone-deaf and privileged (and this is coming from someone who is conservative-leaning).
Re:Goldman Sachs, Patagonia, and the Mysteries of “Business ... by Norfair on Thursday May 23, 2019 @05:39AM (#19990071)
Yes, in fact I used to do that when I worked at Google and people would call security on me. The same thing happened at Facebook
Re:Goldman Sachs, Patagonia, and the Mysteries of “Business ... by CoolGuySteve on Thursday May 23, 2019 @08:21AM (#19990971)
Yeah if I saw someone wandering around in a suit at Apple I'd assume it was a hardware vendor who somehow broke free from his handlers and was snooping for secrets.

Those were pretty much the only people you'd see hanging around in suits.

Re:Goldman Sachs, Patagonia, and the Mysteries of “Business ... by microtherion on Thursday May 23, 2019 @08:41AM (#19991111)
Even at Apple, there are a few people who observe Formal Fridays, and some of them quite extravagantly so.
Re:Goldman Sachs, Patagonia, and the Mysteries of “Business ... by CoolGuySteve on Thursday May 23, 2019 @10:44AM (#19992227)
Yeah... I'm not going to confuse a guy wearing an formal ascot for a visiting engineer.
Re:Goldman Sachs, Patagonia, and the Mysteries of “Business ... by chrisseaton on Thursday May 23, 2019 @05:43AM (#19990097)
Are you being sarcastic? I didn’t claim they’d call security - just that you’d be judged for not knowing the (unwritten, which is the problem) norms.
Re:Goldman Sachs, Patagonia, and the Mysteries of “Business ... by Norfair on Thursday May 23, 2019 @07:32AM (#19990698)
Nope, this was a factual account of my experience
Re:Goldman Sachs, Patagonia, and the Mysteries of “Business ... by nl on Thursday May 23, 2019 @05:48AM (#19990126)
If you wore a suit to a Google office you’d a get similar reaction of ‘this person doesn’t get it’ as you would wearing the wrong thing at Goldman Sachs.

Unless you are Vint Cerf of course.

https://www.forbes.com/forbes/2011/0606/opinions-rich-karlga...

Re:Goldman Sachs, Patagonia, and the Mysteries of “Business ... by mkong1 on Thursday May 23, 2019 @10:19AM (#19992031)
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/10/fashion/matt-jacobson-fac...

reminds of of something similar at fb with matt jacobson, who dresses well:

"And as one of the oldest and best-dressed executives at the company, he still looks completely out of place on Facebook’s campus. “I get stopped by security all the time because they think I am a visitor,” he said. “Security will come up to me, ask to see my visitor’s badge and say, ‘Who are you?’ ”"

Re:Goldman Sachs, Patagonia, and the Mysteries of “Business ... by chrisseaton on Thursday May 23, 2019 @05:49AM (#19990135)
The Forbes question confirms that he’s breaking some kind of rule.

Its not a good counter example because he’s got the social clout to break the rules - knowing when you can do that is also part of the unfairly unwritten rules.

Re:Goldman Sachs, Patagonia, and the Mysteries of “Business ... by sokoloff on Thursday May 23, 2019 @06:59AM (#19990511)
You’ve said unfair twice now. What specifically is unfair about a culture that I experience as “where what works for you; we care what you can do not what you wear.”

If you start in tech on Monday, you’ll know by Tuesday what people wear and by next Friday you’ll probably have enough giveaways to never need to buy a t-shirt or hoodie again.

Re:Goldman Sachs, Patagonia, and the Mysteries of “Business ... by chrisseaton on Thursday May 23, 2019 @08:09AM (#19990903)
> What specifically is unfair about a culture that I experience as “where what works for you; we care what you can do not what you wear.”

But they do care! If you wear a suit they'll think you're not technical like them. A big part of Google culture originally (when it was unusual) was wearing hoodies and jeans rather than chinos and shirts. If you didn't fit in with that you made yourself look like an outsider.

And the unfair bit is that it's not written down anywhere. You just have to implicitly know it. If you don't have family or friends in the industry you won't know it, they won't tell you, and so you won't fit in.

I've seen tech people scoff at people in suits, and look down at them. Have you never seen that?

Re:Goldman Sachs, Patagonia, and the Mysteries of “Business ... by boulos on Thursday May 23, 2019 @08:34AM (#19991067)
The unfair thing isn’t that it’s not written down though. It’s that it’s implicitly “wear whatever you want, except don’t look like old fashioned corporate America” but claims to be “wear whatever”.

Like the other poster mentioned about hardware vendors at Apple wearing suits, it’s probably not personal it’s just stereotypes at play. Google has a particular penchant for “watch out for tailgating” and expects all employees to challenge folks without badges. It’s not common to see other Google engineers in anything particularly formal, so it becomes a clear “hmm, I should make sure that person has a badge” or alternatively “hey security person, I don’t think they have a badge”.

Re:Goldman Sachs, Patagonia, and the Mysteries of “Business ... by ghaff on Thursday May 23, 2019 @08:45AM (#19991142)
You've definitely had this shift from chinos/button-down shirts/boat shoes business casual (i.e. more or less traditional East Coast preppy) to jeans/hoodies/t-shirts/sneakers among much of the tech set at least outside of settings like meeting with customers.

I used to pretty much always wear the business casual "uniform" but a few years ago I found myself going a bit more casual at the more developer-oriented events I would attend because I was starting to feel overdressed.

Re:Goldman Sachs, Patagonia, and the Mysteries of “Business ... by sokoloff on Thursday May 23, 2019 @10:03AM (#19991867)
I think that's human culture, not tech culture. Skaters and musicians and preppies and punks and goths and snowboarders and devout religious groups all have their own norms and behavioral and clothing signaling and most of it is not written down.

If I showed up to a half-pipe in full wedding garb or to a wedding in skater garb, people would reasonably give me weird looks.

Being able to appropriately adapt to different situations is a needed life skill. “In matters of principle, stand like a rock; in matters of taste, swim with the current.” —Thomas Jefferson

The benefit I see in tech is you can wear whatever “weird” clothes you want and be accepted and given a chance to prove you can do the job much more than in most workplaces. Try showing up to a law firm or investment bank in flip flops and shorts vs showing up in a suit in tech. You’ll get a lot farther in the latter than the former. To me, that's fair (or at least wildly more fair.)

Re:Goldman Sachs, Patagonia, and the Mysteries of “Business ... by sturgill on Thursday May 23, 2019 @09:07AM (#19991333)
Maybe I’m an outlier, but I actually like the unwritten rules better than the written ones. Every interview I’ve ever had I make a point to ask what would be expected. At my MBA program (yes, I’m one of those guys) we had to wear slacks and a button down to class every day. And having worked for NYC firms there are different social expectations. So my question is usually phrased like this: “Hey, I’ve worked in situations where a tie was required and where a tie would get one ostracized. Can you give me a quick heads up on normal office attire?”

This usual ends up with some decent back and forth and inevitably I send them the following Oatmeal comic. [0]

My point is that if you play it right, you can turn awkward social norms to your advantage. You just have to be willing to ask.

[0] https://theoatmeal.com/pl/minor_differences5/suit

Re:Goldman Sachs, Patagonia, and the Mysteries of “Business ... by acl777 on Thursday May 23, 2019 @07:49AM (#19990786)
My dress code when interviewing at any company: never dress better than the CEO's profile photo on the company website.
Re:Goldman Sachs, Patagonia, and the Mysteries of “Business ... by ghaff on Thursday May 23, 2019 @08:04AM (#19990876)
It depends on the position and depends on the company/locale. It's very possible in Silicon Valley that you get interviewers judging engineering candidates because they dressed up too much. [Have to have that culture fit, you know.] At most companies, and certainly for non-engineering roles, it almost certainly doesn't hurt to dress up a bit and is considered normal.
Re:Goldman Sachs, Patagonia, and the Mysteries of “Business ... by TheCoelacanth on Thursday May 23, 2019 @10:13AM (#19991971)
At most companies, the CEO's profile picture will have be in a suit, so the heuristic still works.
Re:Goldman Sachs, Patagonia, and the Mysteries of “Business ... by acl777 on Thursday May 23, 2019 @10:22PM (#19997942)
Exactly.

If the CEO dresses in a T-shirt and jeans, there's a _very_ high chance everyone else would be dressing the same or less formal.

Re:Goldman Sachs, Patagonia, and the Mysteries of “Business ... by Cthulhu_ on Thursday May 23, 2019 @07:53AM (#19990807)
Two of my colleagues (both developers) had a phase where they unironically showed up in a tailored suit to work. I still don't know why, I mean I guess the one guy had more of a CTO role but the other one was just a regular developer like me, and the suits didn't make them come off as more important - just more uncomfortable.
Re:Goldman Sachs, Patagonia, and the Mysteries of “Business ... by dagw on Thursday May 23, 2019 @08:43AM (#19991126)
A tailored suit with a well made dress shirt is literally one of the most comfortable things you can wear. Plus you look really good.
Re:Goldman Sachs, Patagonia, and the Mysteries of “Business ... by esoterica on Thursday May 23, 2019 @11:10AM (#19992463)
If suits and dress shirts were comfortable, people would go to bed wearing them. The fact that people wear t-shirts to bed instead should tell you which one is actually more comfortable.
Re:Goldman Sachs, Patagonia, and the Mysteries of “Business ... by JauntTrooper on Thursday May 23, 2019 @09:36AM (#19991627)
Ugh, I disagree. I‘m an investment banker, I wear tailored suits to work every day. Suits are uncomfortable and high maintenance. Give me jeans and a comfortable hoodie any day of the week!
Re:Goldman Sachs, Patagonia, and the Mysteries of “Business ... by dagw on Thursday May 23, 2019 @09:46AM (#19991718)
High maintenance I'll give you (and expensive), but I non of the jeans I own are as comfortable as a nice pair of suit pants and despite the fact that no one would care if I wore a hoodie to work I still wear a dress shirt basically every day because it's just so much nicer.
Re:Goldman Sachs, Patagonia, and the Mysteries of “Business ... by ghaff on Thursday May 23, 2019 @10:43AM (#19992221)
TBH I don't find jeans terribly comfortable and don't wear them very much. In my opinion--and maybe it's just because I'm used to it--the traditional Friday casual Khaki/Button-down shirt hits a sweet spot for office wear.
Re:Goldman Sachs, Patagonia, and the Mysteries of “Business ... by chrisseaton on Thursday May 23, 2019 @11:10AM (#19992461)
If you had your suit tailored and it's uncomfortable then it's defective - take it back to the tailor and explain where it's not comfortable and they'll adjust it for you.
Re:Goldman Sachs, Patagonia, and the Mysteries of “Business ... by v64 on Thursday May 23, 2019 @11:34AM (#19992687)
The most comfortable suit is still more uncomfortable than a t-shirt and shorts.
Re:Goldman Sachs, Patagonia, and the Mysteries of “Business ... by maxxxxx on Thursday May 23, 2019 @09:50AM (#19991757)
I would agree that a well-made dress shirt that fits well is super comfortable. They are just very hard to come by.
Re:Goldman Sachs, Patagonia, and the Mysteries of “Business ... by ghaff on Thursday May 23, 2019 @11:17AM (#19992534)
I doubt they're very hard to come by but they'll be expensive. I've had shirts tailored in Asia but I admittedly don't bother with tailored clothing on a day to day basis.
Re:Goldman Sachs, Patagonia, and the Mysteries of “Business ... by Redoubts on Thursday May 23, 2019 @09:43AM (#19991692)
I don't know what to tell you, you're doing something horribly wrong then.
Re:Goldman Sachs, Patagonia, and the Mysteries of “Business ... by plausibilities on Thursday May 23, 2019 @04:31PM (#19995602)
Anecdotally, the comfort of tailored/fitted apparel can vary based on your body composition.

This is as someone who used to weigh around 255 and now weighs around 170.

The more fit you are, the more comfy fitted/tailored apparel tends to be.

If you are atypically shaped due to various fat deposits, tailored clothing becomes more difficult to get just right in order to not pinch/restrict you in all the wrong places.

Re:Goldman Sachs, Patagonia, and the Mysteries of “Business ... by chrisdhoover on Thursday May 23, 2019 @01:34PM (#19993909)
What about tailored jeans and sweatshirt. That may be the ultimate in comfort
Re:Goldman Sachs, Patagonia, and the Mysteries of “Business ... by chrisseaton on Thursday May 23, 2019 @08:06AM (#19990887)
If you're uncomfortable in a suit then you've just got a badly tailored suit.
Re:Goldman Sachs, Patagonia, and the Mysteries of “Business ... by thrower123 on Thursday May 23, 2019 @07:57AM (#19990832)
Any time I've seen this, the person was interviewing elsewhere and just didn't want to bother bringing an extra set of clothes and changing.
Re:Goldman Sachs, Patagonia, and the Mysteries of “Business ... by sethammons on Thursday May 23, 2019 @08:45AM (#19991150)
Some fellas at work started Formal Fridays. They like the excuse to dress up.
Re:Goldman Sachs, Patagonia, and the Mysteries of “Business ... by sayusasugi on Thursday May 23, 2019 @08:24AM (#19990997)
> I still don't know why

Have you considered that they may enjoy dressing nicely?

Re:Goldman Sachs, Patagonia, and the Mysteries of “Business ... by threatofrain on Thursday May 23, 2019 @11:22AM (#19992578)
I hardly think it's unfair because suits cost money, and the more money you put into the suit the more people can tell. In many tech places people are okay with you wearing the free company t-shirt and khakis. You could look like $50 and be accepted.

That's widening the gate as far as you can.